Re: D semantics, shared as a heap storage specifier

2014-12-08 Thread Etienne via Digitalmars-d
So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for heap storage?

Re: D semantics, shared as a heap storage specifier

2014-12-08 Thread John Colvin via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote: So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for heap storage? I think people are a bit distracted with the scope proposal at the moment.

Re: D semantics, shared as a heap storage specifier

2014-12-08 Thread Dicebot via Digitalmars-d
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 15:07:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote: So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for heap storage? I think people are a bit distracted with the scope proposal at the moment. Yes, there are

Re: D semantics, shared as a heap storage specifier

2014-12-08 Thread Etienne via Digitalmars-d
On 2014-12-08 11:36 AM, Dicebot wrote: On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 15:07:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote: On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote: So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for heap storage? I think people are a bit distracted with the scope

D semantics, shared as a heap storage specifier

2014-12-06 Thread Etienne Cimon via Digitalmars-d
This is the only issue preventing a truly thread-local GC for better multi-core scalability for D applications. From: https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1057#issuecomment-65904128 The best way to achieve a thread-local GC would be to improve and enforce