So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for heap storage?
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote:
So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for
heap storage?
I think people are a bit distracted with the scope proposal at
the moment.
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 15:07:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote:
So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for
heap storage?
I think people are a bit distracted with the scope proposal at
the moment.
Yes, there are
On 2014-12-08 11:36 AM, Dicebot wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 15:07:48 UTC, John Colvin wrote:
On Monday, 8 December 2014 at 14:48:28 UTC, Etienne wrote:
So, nobody is in favor of extending the shared attribute for heap
storage?
I think people are a bit distracted with the scope
This is the only issue preventing a truly thread-local GC for better
multi-core scalability for D applications. From:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/druntime/pull/1057#issuecomment-65904128
The best way to achieve a thread-local GC would be to improve and
enforce