My existing and developing libraries support only D2 :)
Masahiro
On Sun, 22 Jan 2012 01:07:49 +0900, Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com
wrote:
For the last however long, I've been still programming mostly in D1, but
aiming to keep my libraries compatible with both D1 and D2.
But
So far, everyone who's replied is supporting only D2. A few more questions:
Did you previously write libraries for D1?
If so:
- Did you find translating the code straightforward, or are there bits that you found a
challenge?
- What triggered you to switch? For example, D2 just being
I had a small, ~10kloc project I had to rewrite to D2 (not a
library).
It wasn't much of a problem to port. First I just tried to compile
the code with DMD2 - there were compiler errors, so I fixed those
-
that took about 1-2 days. More problematic were things that work
differently in D2 -
On 2012-01-21 17:07, Stewart Gordon wrote:
For the last however long, I've been still programming mostly in D1, but
aiming to keep my libraries compatible with both D1 and D2.
But changes in D2 have made this more of a challenge. I've also been put
off switching to D2 by the wait for D1 to be
On Saturday, 21 January 2012 at 16:07:58 UTC, Stewart Gordon
wrote:
For the last however long, I've been still programming mostly
in D1, but aiming to keep my libraries compatible with both D1
and D2.
I haven't built libraries for D1, I have converted a few from D1.
My things are D2 only,
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:jfh9bb$2v3$1...@digitalmars.com...
So far, everyone who's replied is supporting only D2. A few more
questions:
Did you previously write libraries for D1?
Yes. Made the switch about a year, year and a half ago.
If so:
- Did you
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote in message
news:jfi071$1dps$1...@digitalmars.com...
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:jfh9bb$2v3$1...@digitalmars.com...
- What triggered you to switch? For example, D2 just being there, signs
that D2 is stabilising, the announcement of
For the last however long, I've been still programming mostly in D1, but aiming to keep my
libraries compatible with both D1 and D2.
But changes in D2 have made this more of a challenge. I've also been put off switching to
D2 by the wait for D1 to be finished.
Now the plan to discontinue D1
I'm only supporting D2.
D1 support would require more effort that can be better used
to add more features and create more libraries. New D users are
unlikely to try D1 since D2 is now rather stable, and even if
the do, they won't stay there for long.
I myself started using D with D1 about
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote in message
news:jfenst$av2$1...@digitalmars.com...
How many people here are still using D1?
What are those of you who write libraries mainly doing?
(a) supporting only D1?
(b) supporting only D2?
(c) releasing separate D1 and D2 versions?
(d) using
D2 only.
No point in supporting D1.
11 matches
Mail list logo
