On 07/14/2011 12:49 PM, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Hi, is there a matured framework for building the server side part of
web-apps in D2? I don't need totally fancy things, session handling,
dynamic content and simple output generation.
http://vibed.org/
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 13:05:27 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 09:24:03 UTC, RedX wrote:
is this still working on the latest git (2bfdccc)? I don't
seem to be able to call anything..
I found the bug, I had a static if that was too restrictive and
stopped reading
Am 03.07.2013 12:03, schrieb Russel Winder:
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:39 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
On the other hand threading is everywhere.
Threads (and processes) are like stacks and heaps, you know they are
there but if you are manipulating them explicitly instead of as a
managed resour
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 13:31:56 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
The process pool on Linux though was dead easy and worked
really well. I find it kinda interesting how threads in D seem
to emulate processes too, with TLS giving you a sort of
separate address space - just easier to get right as t
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 09:45:18 UTC, Dicebot wrote:
On the other hand both creating process and thread are so much
more expensive than not creating anything at all :P
I recently added a process pool to cgi.d and it was both the
simplest and the fastest option for the http server it has.
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 09:24:03 UTC, RedX wrote:
is this still working on the latest git (2bfdccc)? I don't seem
to be able to call anything..
I found the bug, I had a static if that was too restrictive and
stopped reading the child object functions.
It is fixed now on the newest githu
On Wed, 2013-07-03 at 11:39 +0200, Paulo Pinto wrote:
[…]
> On the other hand threading is everywhere.
Threads (and processes) are like stacks and heaps, you know they are
there but if you are manipulating them explicitly instead of as a
managed resource, you need to have a very, very good reason
On Wednesday, 3 July 2013 at 09:39:43 UTC, Paulo Pinto wrote:
On the other hand threading is everywhere.
On the other hand both creating process and thread are so much
more expensive than not creating anything at all :P
On Friday, 15 July 2011 at 22:37:00 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 7/15/11 4:26 PM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
IMO it makes sense to use this to reduce process creation
times.
Process creation is a very small cost with D programs. It's
nothing
to worry about unless you have real world data to the
On Friday, 15 July 2011 at 01:00:51 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
Let me list some of the newer features in web.d too, added in
the last couple weeks.
class ApiObject;
These let you expose a more object oriented interface to your
stuff on the url.
class User : ApiObject {
this(Foo foo, str
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivr07p$8cq$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Just a general comment... my D web stuff is spoiling me.
>
> Guy just asked me for a form based file uploader. With web.d:
>
> ===
> import arsd.web;
> import std.file;
> class SiteAdmin : ApiProvider {
>override void
Just a general comment... my D web stuff is spoiling me.
Guy just asked me for a form based file uploader. With web.d:
===
import arsd.web;
import std.file;
class SiteAdmin : ApiProvider {
override void _initialize() { cgi.requireBasicAuth("user", "pass"); }
string uploadNewVideo(Cgi.Upl
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Doesn't that apply more to Unix than to D?
Somewhat, though a lot of the CGI flames from the day were coming
from unix machines.
There's two factors (I speculate) that contributed to it:
a) Linux used to be slower at forking and execing than it is now.
b) Most cgi a
One of the paradigm shifts incurred when I moved to Unix from Windows
was how incredibly cheap it was to create processes on Unix, and how
many great idioms derive from that. In Windows one gets used to thinking
creating a process is a big deal, which requires a fair amount of
unlearning.
On 7/15/11 4:26 PM, Adam Ruppe wrote:
IMO it makes sense to use this to reduce process creation times.
Process creation is a very small cost with D programs. It's nothing
to worry about unless you have real world data to the contrary for
your project.
Doesn't that apply more to Unix than to D
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Does your undo stack persist after the editor (or the file) is
> closed? How big is the undo stack? How easy is to undo to a specific
> working (ie, not "in the middle of a task") state?
It /can/ do them all, though I personally only the infinitely sized
undo stack part. (
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> But, HEAD is technically required (though I have no idea what the
> real-world use-cases are), so I'm not quite sure what to do.
Actually, I'd be surprised if your web server didn't handle it...
it can just send a GET to your app then simply discard the response
body.
As
> IMO it makes sense to use this to reduce process creation times.
Process creation is a very small cost with D programs. It's nothing
to worry about unless you have real world data to the contrary for
your project.
My cgi.d though supports standard cgi, fast cgi, and an embedded
http server, if
On 2011-07-14 16:00:33 +0200, Long Chang said:
I create one , fastcgi & template is done , but I need dynamic link lib
of posix support , ...
I'll take a look at the fastcgi stuff. IMO it makes sense to use this
to reduce process creation times.
--
Robert M. Münch
http://www.robertmuench.de
On 2011-07-14 13:21:32 +0200, Trass3r said:
http://arsdnet.net/dcode/
Thanks (for this link and the other related posts). I'll give it a try
and play around with it. The session stuff can be kept simple via
cookies or a REST interface ID.
--
Robert M. Münch
http://www.robertmuench.de
"Adam Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivp9aq$jn4$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> (The difficulty I'm having there is I really want it to throw on
> not implemented or unknown stuff, but I also want it to be able to
> handle the kind of pure putrid shit you find on the open internet.
Yea, I've been havi
"Adam Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivpdoo$rif$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Sooo...I don't suppose you've given thought to using Hg/BitBucket or
>> Git/GitHub? ;)
>>
>> It'd make a lot of things much easier for both you and others using
>> your code. And it would better fac
I changed my symlinks to hardlinks and it seems to have worked.
So that github thingy is up to date now.
Hopefully it will be simple to keep it that way!
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> Sooo...I don't suppose you've given thought to using Hg/BitBucket or
> Git/GitHub? ;)
>
> It'd make a lot of things much easier for both you and others using
> your code. And it would better facilitate people submitting patches
> to you. Theyare an extra tool to learn and
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> I might have found another one in the new dom.d. Starting at line
> 3006 it has:
Nah, that's just not implemented. The reason those cases are there
is the browser app would throw an exception on it (assert(0) I believe)
if it didn't recognize the names, but those are commo
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivo1ga$1ete$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Oh, one other thing I noticed: With DMD 2.054 banning implicit
>> switch/case fallthrough, it pointed out an implicit fallthrough
>> in dom.d at line 2641
>
> That's interesting... I updated my d
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivo1ga$1ete$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> Oh, one other thing I noticed: With DMD 2.054 banning implicit
>> switch/case fallthrough, it pointed out an implicit fallthrough
>> in dom.d at line 2641
>
> That's interesting... I updated my d
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivo1ga$1ete$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> (Not sure why IIS changes the redirect's "/" to "localstart.asp",
>> probably just IIS trying to be "smart", but I usually only use IIS >
>> locally, so
> I don't really care right now).
>
> It'
Let me list some of the newer features in web.d too, added in
the last couple weeks.
class ApiObject;
These let you expose a more object oriented interface to your
stuff on the url.
class User : ApiObject {
this(Foo foo, string id) {}
}
class Foo : ApiProvider {
alias User user;
}
==
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> (Not sure why IIS changes the redirect's "/" to "localstart.asp",
> probably just IIS trying to be "smart", but I usually only use IIS > locally,
> so
I don't really care right now).
It's possible I messed up... the line of code is specifically:
cgi.setResponseLo
"Adam D. Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivnq7e$1244$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Nick Sabalausky wrote:
>> I'm having trouble figuring out how to use the executable.
>
> [...helpful info...]
Cool, thanks. On the cmdline, setting the env PATH_INFO to / makes it work.
In the browser/IIS, adding a tra
Nick Sabalausky wrote:
> I'm having trouble figuring out how to use the executable.
You'll need to make sure the program is set to run as CGI
and that the stuff after the path is forwarded to the program.
In Apache, dropping it in cgi-bin does both for you, or you can do
a SetHandler cgi-script
"Adam Ruppe" wrote in message
news:ivms0h$s8p$1...@digitalmars.com...
>
> Finally, web.d builds on top of dom and cgi to provide a higher
> level interface; instead of manually parsing the cgi object, it tries
> to do it automatically, to call your functions with reflection.
>
I recently started
Hi Robert,
On Thu, 14 Jul 2011 19:49:10 +0900, Robert M. Münch
wrote:
dynamic content and simple output generation.
In this point, I implement simple template engine called Mustache(Pure D
and single file).
https://bitbucket.org/repeatedly/mustache4d/overview
Sorry, I don't have other
On 14/07/2011 11:49, Robert M. Münch wrote:
Hi, is there a matured framework for building the server side part of
web-apps in D2? I don't need totally fancy things, session handling,
dynamic content and simple output generation.
I recommend Adam's given that he's using it in production. I shoul
I create one , fastcgi & template is done , but I need dynamic link lib of
posix support , http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=6014 also
block the jade template engine .
https://github.com/sleets/oak
Oh I forgot to mention what it *doesn't* do - session handling. Over
the last year and a half that I've been using it for real sites every
day, I just haven't felt the need for that beyond the most basic
cookie thing and the database.
If I need something like a session, I've always just done it in
> http://arsdnet.net/dcode/
In there, you'll find most my files for the websites I create in D.
The basic one is cgi.d. It gives easy access to things like get and
post variables, uploaded files, and writing out responses. I think
it works standing alone, but it might require the sha.d in there t
http://arsdnet.net/dcode/
Hi, is there a matured framework for building the server side part of
web-apps in D2? I don't need totally fancy things, session handling,
dynamic content and simple output generation.
--
Robert M. Münch
http://www.robertmuench.de
40 matches
Mail list logo
