On 8/03/2016 8:42 PM, Johan Engelen wrote:
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 22:19:46 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
On 8/03/2016 7:12 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
or perhaps a remnant of
semi-automated C++->D conversion?
That.
:)
Out with it, then?
If it still links. Vtbl emission can be tricky.
On Monday, 7 March 2016 at 22:19:46 UTC, Daniel Murphy wrote:
On 8/03/2016 7:12 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
or perhaps a remnant of
semi-automated C++->D conversion?
That.
:)
Out with it, then?
On 3/7/2016 2:19 PM, Daniel Murphy wrote:
That.
Daniel is a man of few words :-)
On 8/03/2016 7:12 AM, Johan Engelen wrote:
or perhaps a remnant of
semi-automated C++->D conversion?
That.
(this is about DDMD internals, but the DMD-internals forum is
maillist only, so posting here. Pardon me please. [*] )
Currently some functions are defined (as opposed to declared)
both in C++ and in D. For example, all of Visitor's virtual
methods. The "double-defined" methods are all defined
