On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
Your thoughts?
Makes sense to me. The current behavior seems needlessly
inconsistent.
- Jonathan M Davis
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
Your thoughts?
HAHAHAHAHA consistency, good one :)
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:54:01 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott
wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
Your thoughts?
I guess there's no reason not to, so LGTM.
The use of the deprecated attribute on variables seems
misguided in the
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
Your thoughts?
OK. Is deprecated on variables used by anyone here?
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 12:33:19 UTC, deadalnix wrote:
HAHAHAHAHA consistency, good one :)
We can dream.
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
Your thoughts?
On Thursday, 14 January 2016 at 02:31:38 UTC, Brian Schott wrote:
http://wiki.dlang.org/DIP86
Your thoughts?
I guess there's no reason not to, so LGTM.
The use of the deprecated attribute on variables seems misguided
in the first place though. I don't see much use for it vs
possible use on