On Monday, 1 June 2015 at 03:49:39 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Destroyed. -- Andrei
Thx
On 5/28/15 2:23 PM, Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?=
per.nord...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, Andrei, there's a new lazy range PR for Phobos on GitHub awaiting
review... ;)
Destroyed. -- Andrei
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:23:59 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/79cc8bf0766282368f05314d00566e7d234988bd/bylinefast.d#L207
which is currently deactivated.
It has worked flawlessly in my applications, so none AFAIK.
Could this replace the stuck
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Speed-up varies between 2.0 and 2.7 according to recent
experiments done using new unittest at
The test file
http://downloads.dbpedia.org/3.9/en/instance_types_en.nt.bz2
contains 15.9 Mlines :)
/Per
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 08:48:59 UTC, Martin Nowak wrote:
https://github.com/D-Programming-Language/phobos/pull/2794?
That's a massive discussion. Is it possible to describe in
shorter terms what the problem is and how it relates to byLine?
Please.
On Friday, 29 May 2015 at 09:17:17 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
That's a massive discussion. Is it possible to describe in
shorter terms what the problem is and how it relates to byLine?
Would the problem be solved if `byLine` was changed to not use
`readln()`?
On 5/28/15 2:05 PM, Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?=
per.nord...@gmail.com wrote:
How faster is bylinefast compared to byline (after the recent
improvements)? -- Andrei
About 3 times in my measurements.
Cool! What are the incompatibilities keeping it from replacing byLine?
-- Andrei
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 20:54:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Cool! What are the incompatibilities keeping it from replacing
byLine? -- Andrei
Speed-up varies between 2.0 and 2.7 according to recent
experiments done using new unittest at
How faster is bylinefast compared to byline (after the recent
improvements)? -- Andrei
About 3 times in my measurements.
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 21:23:59 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 20:54:59 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Cool! What are the incompatibilities keeping it from replacing
byLine? -- Andrei
Speed-up varies between 2.0 and 2.7 according to recent
experiments done using
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 15:21:38 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I might be wrong, but I thought dip25 was only enabled in @safe
annotated code?
I updated bylinefast at
https://github.com/nordlow/justd/blob/master/bylinefast.d#L188
to make the unittest @safe and members of @trusted.
DMD (2.067
On Thursday, 28 May 2015 at 11:38:25 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
DMD (2.067 and git master) with -dip25 still doesn't complain
about
...
My guess is that this passes because the internal storage is
GC-allocated. I'm sensing we need a new qualifier for this or
that there is more logic to come in
On 5/28/15 5:38 AM, Per =?UTF-8?B?Tm9yZGzDtnci?=
per.nord...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 15:21:38 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I might be wrong, but I thought dip25 was only enabled in @safe
annotated code?
I updated bylinefast at
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 08:38:48 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
AFAIK, in current DMD, I can't get any help in avoiding
patterns such as
char[] saved_line;
foreach (line; File(foo.txt).byLine)
{
saved_line = line; // should give error
}
If I understand you correctly, a
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 10:53:48 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 09:54:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Yes. First of all, `File.byLine.front` is the function that
needs to get annotated, like this:
char[] front() return {
// ...
return buffer;
}
The
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 21:22:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
No, DMD cannot currently handle scope on foreach elements. It
errors as
Error: basic type expected, not scope
Quite possible, didn't test it. Anyway, my point was that it
simply isn't necessary to ever mark a local variable
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 08:43:07 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 08:38:48 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
AFAIK, in current DMD, I can't get any help in avoiding
patterns such as
char[] saved_line;
foreach (line; File(foo.txt).byLine)
{
saved_line = line; //
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 08:30:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
See above. Conceptually, you can of course treat it as if it
were marked with `scope`, but an actual annotation should not
be necessary.
But now you're talking about an upcoming feature in DMD, right?
AFAIK, in current DMD, I
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 08:38:48 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 08:30:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
See above. Conceptually, you can of course treat it as if it
were marked with `scope`, but an actual annotation should not
be necessary.
But now you're talking about an
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 09:54:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Yes. First of all, `File.byLine.front` is the function that
needs to get annotated, like this:
char[] front() return {
// ...
return buffer;
}
The `return` keyword here means the same thing as in DIP25,
Is
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 11:02:24 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 10:53:48 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 09:54:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Yes. First of all, `File.byLine.front` is the function that
needs to get annotated, like this:
char[]
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 14:13:03 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
I general, `return` is supposed to work (with -dip25), but only
in combination with `ref`, not slices or pointers. DMD probably
ignores it here instead of printing an error message.
So, *should* it error for slices or not?
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 11:02:24 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 10:53:48 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 09:54:33 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
Yes. First of all, `File.byLine.front` is the function that
needs to get annotated, like this:
char[]
On Wednesday, 27 May 2015 at 15:21:38 UTC, weaselcat wrote:
I might be wrong, but I thought dip25 was only enabled in @safe
annotated code?
Does this mean that I have to @safe-qualify `ByLineFast.front()`
or the function iterating over it or both?
Or does it suffice to @trusted-qualify
On Monday, 25 May 2015 at 12:43:04 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in
a
given scope? If not where could this information be extracted
(in
which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if so,
be stored?
Reason: After having read
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 15:21:04 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 14:59:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 10:19:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... to be used in templates and for enforcing these rules:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 10:19:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... to be used in templates and for enforcing these rules:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope3#.40safe-ty_violations_with_borrowing
There's at least a plan. Nice!
One thing, though. I'm lacking a section in the document linked
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 14:59:38 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Tuesday, 26 May 2015 at 10:19:52 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
... to be used in templates and for enforcing these rules:
http://wiki.dlang.org/User:Schuetzm/scope3#.40safe-ty_violations_with_borrowing
There's at least a plan. Nice!
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in a
given scope? If not where could this information be extracted (in
which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if so,
be stored?
Reason: After having read about Rust's data-flow (and in turn
escape) analysis I'm very
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:41:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Ping!?
On Thursday, 21 May 2015 at 11:52:34 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:41:09 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Ping!?
I think you'd be more likely to get responses to this sort of
question in the main group, not
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 08:52:23 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in
a given scope? If not where could this information be extracted
(in which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if
so, be stored?
I'm guessing
Does DMD currently do any analysis of references to a symbol in a
given scope? If not where could this information be extracted (in
which visitor/callback) and in what structure should it, if so,
be stored?
Reason: After having read about Rust's data-flow (and in turn
escape) analysis I'm
On Wednesday, 20 May 2015 at 09:27:06 UTC, Per Nordlöw wrote:
Two cases come to my mind:
A: Non-Templated Function: must be @safe (or perhaps @trusted)
pure and parameter must qualified as const (or in).
B: Templated Function: Usage of parameter in body must be
non-mutating; meaning no lhs of
34 matches
Mail list logo
