Is this in Bugzilla?
On 4/29/14, Wyatt via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
I'm sorry, but can you explain how this lets an attacker learn
anything useful?
Maybe I over-exaggerated a little bit here.
On 4/29/14, Kenji Hara via Digitalmars-d digitalmars-d@puremagic.com wrote:
This is a compiler
-
import std.traits;
import std.stdio;
void handler(C)(C callback)
{
callback(John);
}
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = hunter2)
{
writefln(The password is: '%s', pass);
};
handler(safeCallback);
someOtherFunc();
}
void
On Tuesday, 29 April 2014 at 10:38:24 UTC, Andrej Mitrovic via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
void main()
{
auto safeCallback = (string user, string pass = hunter2)
{
writefln(The password is: '%s', pass);
};
I'm sorry, but can you explain how this lets an attacker learn
anything
This is a compiler bug.
When template parameter C is deduced from the call handler(safeCallback),
the default argument `= hunter2 should be stripped from the deduced
function pointer type.
Then, the call callback(John); in handler template function body should
fail to compile always, because
