On Fri, 25 Nov 2011 04:13:18 +0100, Walter Bright
wrote:
On 11/22/2011 7:19 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
- Can we slowly start to acquire DWARF-3/4?
Dwarf 2 is good enough, so why do 3/4?
- Why were extensions chosen over say representing an array as two
field struct?
Because it is presuma
Walter Bright writes:
> On 11/22/2011 7:19 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
>> - Can we slowly start to acquire DWARF-3/4?
>
> Dwarf 2 is good enough, so why do 3/4?
>
>> - Why were extensions chosen over say representing an array as two field
>> struct?
>
> Because it is presumably harder to get a debug
"Martin Nowak" writes:
> On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:18:47 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe someone knowledgeable could chime in:
>>
>> http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-11/msg00066.html
>>
>>
>>
>> Andrei
>
> I think we should follow Tom Tromney's proposal to add the extensions
> under
Martin Nowak Wrote:
> I think we should follow Tom Tromney's proposal to add the extensions
> under the GNU vendor space, i.e. prefix them with 0x41xx.
Yeah, why use extensible debug info format and not use the extensibility
feature?
On 11/22/2011 7:19 AM, Martin Nowak wrote:
- Can we slowly start to acquire DWARF-3/4?
Dwarf 2 is good enough, so why do 3/4?
- Why were extensions chosen over say representing an array as two field struct?
Because it is presumably harder to get a debugger to recognize a magic struct
than
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 16:19:00 +0100, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:18:47 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Maybe someone knowledgeable could chime in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-11/msg00066.html
Andrei
I think we should follow Tom Tromney's proposal to add the exte
On 2011-11-23 13:24, Roald Ribe wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:19:00 -0300, Martin Nowak wrote:
- Are there other DWARF debuggers that we should take into account?
Depends on what "taking into account" means in this context.
The OpenWatcom debugger (wd/wdw) supports DWARF-2, and is released
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 12:19:00 -0300, Martin Nowak wrote:
- Are there other DWARF debuggers that we should take into account?
Depends on what "taking into account" means in this context.
The OpenWatcom debugger (wd/wdw) supports DWARF-2, and is released for
WIN32, OS/2 and Linux (wd only). I
On 2011-11-22 21:04, bioinfornatics wrote:
Le mardi 22 novembre 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
On 2011-11-22 16:19, Martin Nowak wrote:
- Are there other DWARF debuggers that we should take into account?
The LLBD debugger: http://lldb.llvm.org/
LLDB seem to be great but is OS
Le mardi 22 novembre 2011 à 16:27 +0100, Jacob Carlborg a écrit :
> On 2011-11-22 16:19, Martin Nowak wrote:
> > - Are there other DWARF debuggers that we should take into account?
>
> The LLBD debugger: http://lldb.llvm.org/
>
LLDB seem to be great but is OSX only ;'(
On 11/22/2011 04:19 PM, Martin Nowak wrote:
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:18:47 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Maybe someone knowledgeable could chime in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-11/msg00066.html
Andrei
I think we should follow Tom Tromney's proposal to add the extensions
under the
mta`chrono wrote:
> A noob question from my side: What is DWARF?
http://dwarfstd.org/
On 2011-11-22 16:19, Martin Nowak wrote:
- Are there other DWARF debuggers that we should take into account?
The LLBD debugger: http://lldb.llvm.org/
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Tue, 22 Nov 2011 04:18:47 +0100, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
Maybe someone knowledgeable could chime in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-11/msg00066.html
Andrei
I think we should follow Tom Tromney's proposal to add the extensions
under the GNU vendor space, i.e. prefix them with 0x
On 2011-11-22 13:13, mta`chrono wrote:
A noob question from my side: What is DWARF?
By the way I never touched the sources of gdb. I'm just a friendly user
of it.
It's a standardized debugging data format.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DWARF
--
/Jacob Carlborg
22.11.2011 15:13, mta`chrono пишет:
A noob question from my side: What is DWARF?
By the way I never touched the sources of gdb. I'm just a friendly user
of it.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=gdb+DWARF&l=1
It's basically about this:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4180
A noob question from my side: What is DWARF?
By the way I never touched the sources of gdb. I'm just a friendly user
of it.
Maybe someone knowledgeable could chime in:
http://sourceware.org/ml/gdb/2011-11/msg00066.html
Andrei
19 matches
Mail list logo
