I played with some algorithms today and got about a 7x
improvement in reduction time for my test case. The data is now
arranged into a binary tree, and the progress indicator was
changed to reflect that. Let me know if I broke anything in the
process.
No new features have been added. Still th
On 23 February 2012 02:25, Vladimir Panteleev
wrote:
> I played with some algorithms today and got about a 7x improvement in
> reduction time for my test case. The data is now arranged into a binary
> tree, and the progress indicator was changed to reflect that. Let me know if
> I broke anything i
I played with some algorithms today and got about a 7x improvement in
reduction time for my test case. The data is now arranged into a binary
tree, and the progress indicator was changed to reflect that. Let me
know if I broke anything in the process.
Hooray, DustMite ftw!
Unfortunately plenty of 64Bit errors again :/
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 11:52:17 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Unfortunately plenty of 64Bit errors again :/
I can't test for these easily (I wish DMD on Windows had -m64
working with -o-).
On 23/02/2012 13:05, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 11:52:17 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
Unfortunately plenty of 64Bit errors again :/
I can't test for these easily (I wish DMD on Windows had -m64 working
with -o-).
Fixed - https://github.com/CyberShadow/DustMite/pull/7
"Vladimir Panteleev" wrote in message
news:mnaydzddphyxlgpsw...@forum.dlang.org...
> On Thursday, 23 February 2012 at 11:52:17 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
>> Unfortunately plenty of 64Bit errors again :/
>
> I can't test for these easily (I wish DMD on Windows had -m64 working
> with -o-).
As a Windows
I pushed out another large update today[1]. Changes include
comma-separated list support (no more stray empty modules), a
better progress indicator, a more useful/intuitive --noremove
option, several bugfixes, as well as a large internal overhaul
and the arrival to the bottom of my to-do list :
Kudos!
On 3/4/12, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> I pushed out another large update today.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I can't wait for my next ICE to
try it out. :p
On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 06:04:36PM +0100, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
> On 3/4/12, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
> > I pushed out another large update today.
>
> I can't believe I'm saying this, but I can't wait for my next ICE to
> try it out. :p
Just play around with AA's a bit and you'll run into lots
On 3/4/12, H. S. Teoh wrote:
> Just play around with AA's a bit and you'll run into lots of them. ;-)
> Especially unusual AA's, like unusual key types.
Oh don't worry, I'm all too familiar with ICEs. :) They do mostly show
up when doing metaprogramming and not that often in regular code.
On 02/22/2012 09:25 PM, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I played with some algorithms today and got about a 7x improvement in
reduction time for my test case. The data is now arranged into a binary
tree, and the progress indicator was changed to reflect that. Let me
know if I broke anything in the proc
On 03/04/2012 12:04 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/4/12, Vladimir Panteleev wrote:
I pushed out another large update today.
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I can't wait for my next ICE to
try it out. :p
Here's one for DMD 2.057. Knock yourself out ;)
(As I mentioned in my other post
If it's because my compiler is a version behind, then don't worry about
it too much.
Yep it uses the new => syntax.
Here's one for DMD 2.057. Knock yourself out ;)
(As I mentioned in my other post, I can't build DustMite right now, or
I'd do it myself. But if you want one...)
--
chad@Hugin ~/dprojects/database $ dmd ice.d
entity.(fld)
Internal error: e2ir.c 683
I can't believe I'm saying this, but I can't wait for my next ICE to
try it out. :p
Me too :D
On 3/4/12, Chad J wrote:
> Here's one for DMD 2.057. Knock yourself out ;)
It's reproducible in 2.058 too. Reduced test-case:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/560891/
That ran really really fast compared to older versions of dustmite.
Great work Vlad. :)
On 3/4/12, Trass3r wrote:
>> I can't believe I'm saying this, but I can't wait for my next ICE to
>> try it out. :p
>
> Me too :D
>
Son of a gun, you beat me to it! lol
On 04.03.2012 23:17, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
On 3/4/12, Chad J wrote:
Here's one for DMD 2.057. Knock yourself out ;)
It's reproducible in 2.058 too. Reduced test-case:
http://paste.pocoo.org/show/560891/
That ran really really fast compared to older versions of dustmite.
Great work Vlad. :)
On 03/04/2012 02:12 PM, Trass3r wrote:
Here's one for DMD 2.057. Knock yourself out ;)
(As I mentioned in my other post, I can't build DustMite right now, or
I'd do it myself. But if you want one...)
--
chad@Hugin ~/dprojects/database $ dmd ice.d
enti
On Sunday, 4 March 2012 at 19:43:47 UTC, Chad J wrote:
On 03/04/2012 02:12 PM, Trass3r wrote:
Here's one for DMD 2.057. Knock yourself out ;)
(As I mentioned in my other post, I can't build DustMite
right now, or
I'd do it myself. But if you want one...)
-
On Sunday, 4 March 2012 at 19:06:01 UTC, Trass3r wrote:
If it's because my compiler is a version behind, then don't
worry about it too much.
Yep it uses the new => syntax.
Fixed the 64-bit and 2.058-only problems, should build on older
and x64 compilers now.
Am 04.03.2012, 19:39 Uhr, schrieb Chad J :
DMD32 D Compiler v2.057
on Gentoo Linux
If it's because my compiler is a version behind, then don't worry about
it too much. I haven't updated because issue 5278
(http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5278) makes it a pain for
me to upgrade th
24 matches
Mail list logo
