On 02/07/2011 11:38 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame as
the returned string is immediately processed and discarded in my XML
writer. Are there
On Tuesday 08 February 2011 07:55:23 spir wrote:
On 02/07/2011 11:38 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame
as the returned string is immediately
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:55:23 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/07/2011 11:38 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a
shame as
the returned
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 11:09:44 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:55:23 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 02/07/2011 11:38 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
I know about Steven's proposal but it applies only to user types not
primitives. Either way std.conv.to would need a buffered output range as
integers are written from the right. Any chance for an abstraction
analogous to buffered input ranges discussed
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
For the latter, Tomek's idea of passing an output range as
an optional second parameter seems appropriate. Please file as an
enhancement to bugzilla. If anyone has time to work on this, please do.
If not, I'll work on it as my schedule allows.
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame as the
returned string is immediately processed and discarded in my XML writer. Are
there plans to include a custom output variant, e.g. to!string(7, outputRange)?
--
Tomek
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame as
the returned string is immediately processed and discarded in my XML
writer. Are there plans to include a custom output variant, e.g.
to!string(7, outputRange)?
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame as
the returned string is immediately processed and discarded in my XML
writer. Are there plans to include a custom output variant,
On 2/7/11 4:43 PM, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame as
the returned string is immediately processed and discarded in my XML
writer. Are there plans to include a custom output
On 2/7/11 5:38 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a shame as
the returned string is immediately processed and discarded in my XML
writer. Are there plans
On 2/7/11 7:25 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
On 2/7/11 5:38 PM, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Jonathan M Davis napisał:
On Monday 07 February 2011 13:10:09 Tomek Sowiński wrote:
Looks like std.conv.to always allocates behind the scenes. It's a
shame as
the returned string is immediately processed
12 matches
Mail list logo
