On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 23:22:22 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:57:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:22:12 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Like, which arguments actually pass and which ones fail, etc.
Yes, I agree entirely. This would be a HUGE
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:57:09 UTC, Adam D. Ruppe wrote:
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:22:12 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Like, which arguments actually pass and which ones fail, etc.
Yes, I agree entirely. This would be a HUGE usability bonus,
far better than most the other things people
On Friday, 13 January 2017 at 22:22:12 UTC, Ignacious wrote:
Like, which arguments actually pass and which ones fail, etc.
Yes, I agree entirely. This would be a HUGE usability bonus, far
better than most the other things people work on...
It would be EXTREMELY helpful if dmd would give a better result
than
main.d(30): Error: template main.Do cannot deduce function from
argument types !(1, string, int)(2, "adf"), candidates are:
main.d(6):main.Do(int x, string y, alias Q)(int z, string
q)
Like, which arguments actually
