Hello!
After posting about "how to resolve "object-relational impedance
mismatch" using D" dilemma, I did some more homework and today finally
(after being advised in sqlite group) went through The Vietnam of
Computer Science
(http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/06/26/The+Vietnam+Of+Computer+Science.a
Le 23/02/2012 15:50, Gour a écrit :
Hello!
After posting about "how to resolve "object-relational impedance
mismatch" using D" dilemma, I did some more homework and today finally
(after being advised in sqlite group) went through The Vietnam of
Computer Science
(http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/0
On 2/23/2012 6:50 AM, Gour wrote:
I'm curious if
anyone more experienced with using FP paradigm in D can comment what
works nicely and is there anything important missing in today's
implementation of D?
The main issue with FP in D today is it needs to be pervasively used in Phobos
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:38 -0800
Walter Bright wrote:
> The main issue with FP in D today is it needs to be pervasively used
> in Phobos. A large part of Phobos should be marked as pure, but is
> not, making it difficult to use Phobos from FP code.
Heh, that's interesting...
On 2/24/2012 12:20 PM, Gour wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:38 -0800
Walter Bright wrote:
The main issue with FP in D today is it needs to be pervasively used
in Phobos. A large part of Phobos should be marked as pure, but is
not, making it difficult to use Phobos from FP code.
Heh, that