FP in D (today)

2012-02-23 Thread Gour
Hello! After posting about "how to resolve "object-relational impedance mismatch" using D" dilemma, I did some more homework and today finally (after being advised in sqlite group) went through The Vietnam of Computer Science (http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/06/26/The+Vietnam+Of+Computer+Science.a

Re: FP in D (today)

2012-02-23 Thread deadalnix
Le 23/02/2012 15:50, Gour a écrit : Hello! After posting about "how to resolve "object-relational impedance mismatch" using D" dilemma, I did some more homework and today finally (after being advised in sqlite group) went through The Vietnam of Computer Science (http://blogs.tedneward.com/2006/0

Re: FP in D (today)

2012-02-23 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/23/2012 6:50 AM, Gour wrote: I'm curious if anyone more experienced with using FP paradigm in D can comment what works nicely and is there anything important missing in today's implementation of D? The main issue with FP in D today is it needs to be pervasively used in Phobos

Re: FP in D (today)

2012-02-24 Thread Gour
On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:38 -0800 Walter Bright wrote: > The main issue with FP in D today is it needs to be pervasively used > in Phobos. A large part of Phobos should be marked as pure, but is > not, making it difficult to use Phobos from FP code. Heh, that's interesting...

Re: FP in D (today)

2012-02-24 Thread Walter Bright
On 2/24/2012 12:20 PM, Gour wrote: On Thu, 23 Feb 2012 10:45:38 -0800 Walter Bright wrote: The main issue with FP in D today is it needs to be pervasively used in Phobos. A large part of Phobos should be marked as pure, but is not, making it difficult to use Phobos from FP code. Heh, that&#