On 22/05/2018 3:31 AM, ixid wrote:
On Saturday, 19 May 2018 at 15:09:38 UTC, Joakim wrote:
D does well, comes in second on Mac/Win/linux:
https://github.com/frol/completely-unscientific-benchmarks
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8jbfa7/naive_benchmark_treap_implementation_of_c_rus
On Saturday, 19 May 2018 at 15:09:38 UTC, Joakim wrote:
D does well, comes in second on Mac/Win/linux:
https://github.com/frol/completely-unscientific-benchmarks
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8jbfa7/naive_benchmark_treap_implementation_of_c_rust/
Can any experts improve this to
21.05.2018 17:11, Nerve пишет:
Sorry for double-posting, but I've included a GC-enabled solution based
on their Java solution, and have a pull request up that's a bit more
idiomatic, pulling unnecessary static methods out as functions.
It scores VERY HIGH across the board on their "naive" be
On Sunday, 20 May 2018 at 15:30:37 UTC, Nerve wrote:
I'll see if I can get it included so they can test it on their
specific setup.
Sorry for double-posting, but I've included a GC-enabled solution
based on their Java solution, and have a pull request up that's a
bit more idiomatic, pulling u
On Saturday, 19 May 2018 at 15:09:38 UTC, Joakim wrote:
D does well, comes in second on Mac/Win/linux:
https://github.com/frol/completely-unscientific-benchmarks
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8jbfa7/naive_benchmark_treap_implementation_of_c_rust/
The results in these tests are
D does well, comes in second on Mac/Win/linux:
https://github.com/frol/completely-unscientific-benchmarks
https://www.reddit.com/r/programming/comments/8jbfa7/naive_benchmark_treap_implementation_of_c_rust/
