Free Software needs Free Documentation

2011-03-24 Thread spir
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html I think this applies directly to D2. Note: this post is no offence to Andrei's great work. Just a report we /also/ need a free/copyleft D2 manual; or that TDPL's content becomes free in a short while. Even more since TDPL was kind of a premature

Re: Free Software needs Free Documentation

2011-03-24 Thread Andrej Mitrovic
So write some documentation then. We don't need any more philosophical topics on what should/should not be done.

Re: Free Software needs Free Documentation

2011-03-24 Thread Don
spir wrote: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html I think this applies directly to D2. Note: this post is no offence to Andrei's great work. Just a report we /also/ need a free/copyleft D2 manual; or that TDPL's content becomes free in a short while. Even more since TDPL was kind of a

Re: Free Software needs Free Documentation

2011-03-24 Thread Daniel Gibson
Am 24.03.2011 16:22, schrieb Don: spir wrote: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html I think this applies directly to D2. Note: this post is no offence to Andrei's great work. Just a report we /also/ need a free/copyleft D2 manual; or that TDPL's content becomes free in a short while.

Re: Free Software needs Free Documentation

2011-03-24 Thread Vladimir Panteleev
On Thu, 24 Mar 2011 17:22:10 +0200, Don nos...@nospam.com wrote: I would say that what we really need is tutorials, rather than a refernce work. Most urgently we need to make sure that the existing tutorials that contain errors or refer to obsolete/removed features, get pulled down.

Re: Free Software needs Free Documentation

2011-03-24 Thread spir
On 03/24/2011 04:58 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote: Am 24.03.2011 16:22, schrieb Don: spir wrote: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-doc.html I think this applies directly to D2. Note: this post is no offence to Andrei's great work. Just a report we /also/ need a free/copyleft D2 manual; or that