On Sat, 19 Feb 2011 22:39:10 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
"bearophile" wrote in message
news:ijpkh8$232r$1...@digitalmars.com...
dsimcha:
Yeh, I rebuilt the same model in my head over the past few hours (like
you, I had a good mental model of the GC at one point but have slowly
forgotten i
"bearophile" wrote in message
news:ijpkh8$232r$1...@digitalmars.com...
> dsimcha:
>
>> Yeh, I rebuilt the same model in my head over the past few hours (like
>> you, I had a good mental model of the GC at one point but have slowly
>> forgotten it).
>
> For serious D programmers having such model
dsimcha:
> Yeh, I rebuilt the same model in my head over the past few hours (like
> you, I had a good mental model of the GC at one point but have slowly
> forgotten it).
For serious D programmers having such model in the head is so important that
I'd like a short page with such explanations &
...and actually, forget() would only work for arrays of primitives,
because if the object has pointers, you can change what these point to
after calling forget() and Bad Things Can Happen.
On 2/19/2011 6:17 PM, dsimcha wrote:
Yeh, I rebuilt the same model in my head over the past few hours (li
Yeh, I rebuilt the same model in my head over the past few hours (like
you, I had a good mental model of the GC at one point but have slowly
forgotten it). Unfortunately it looks like there's no easy fix. It
also seems like gcbits are allocated as 1 bit for every 16 bytes of heap
space, no ma
