Re: Humble revamp of @trust, @safe and @unsafe

2009-12-07 Thread retard
Fri, 27 Nov 2009 06:31:23 -0500, #ponce wrote: I think that in the current design of safety, @trusted function and normal functions are quite similar. An @unsafe proposal has been rejected because of complexity. But here is a case that is left. Sometimes in D1, I found that a function I

Humble revamp of @trust, @safe and @unsafe

2009-11-27 Thread #ponce
I think that in the current design of safety, @trusted function and normal functions are quite similar. An @unsafe proposal has been rejected because of complexity. But here is a case that is left. Sometimes in D1, I found that a function I tought trustworthy is in fact completely buggy. I

Re: Humble revamp of @trust, @safe and @unsafe

2009-11-27 Thread Don
#ponce wrote: I think that in the current design of safety, @trusted function and normal functions are quite similar. An @unsafe proposal has been rejected because of complexity. No it hasn't been rejected. It's implemented in D2.037 (it's called @system now).