On 5/12/17 10:10 AM, Meta wrote:
On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 13:50:50 UTC, ixid wrote:
I think the word dump would be too confusing for users based on the
history of the term in C. It should be writeFormattedVariableLn.
/sarcasm.
Just parodying the frankly ridiculous response to 'print'.
In all
On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 13:50:50 UTC, ixid wrote:
I think the word dump would be too confusing for users based on
the history of the term in C. It should be
writeFormattedVariableLn. /sarcasm.
Just parodying the frankly ridiculous response to 'print'.
In all seriousness, debugPrint or some
On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 12:55:37 UTC, Seb wrote:
Hi all,
last year there has been a discussion about adding a utility
method for easily dumping variables during debugging to Phobos
[3971].
The effort stalled and after a couple of months I tried to
reboot it [4318]. Now this PR got stalled a
On Friday, 12 May 2017 at 12:55:37 UTC, Seb wrote:
1) Do you think there should be language / compiler support for
dumping variables nicely?
Yes
2) Would you use dump!(x, y)?
YES!
3) Should there be a version of dump that is set to be `@nogc
@safe nothrow pure`, s.t. it can be inserted an
Hi all,
last year there has been a discussion about adding a utility
method for easily dumping variables during debugging to Phobos
[3971].
The effort stalled and after a couple of months I tried to reboot
it [4318]. Now this PR got stalled as well and I am rethinking
the work.
I think dump!(
