On 28/08/10 18:47, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2010-08-28 01:44, Justin Johansson wrote:
To sum up, I'd really appreciate feedback as to whether or not is
worth considering D as a suitable language for implementing a dynamic
language having a non-trivial type system, or is a higher level
approach (
On 2010-08-28 01:44, Justin Johansson wrote:
As one who has an interest in developing dynamic languages, I'm
finding that implementing a DL which features both static and dynamic
typing in classical OO/imperative languages to be quite a challenge.
Recently I came across Microsoft's Dynamic Langu
On 08/27/2010 07:50 PM, Justin Johansson wrote:
Hmm, perhaps "Implementing dynamic languages in D" would
have been more apt as a subject line, but hopefully people
will understand the gist of my post.
- Justin
I've thought about something like that. Probably not quite what you
were thinking a
Hmm, perhaps "Implementing dynamic languages in D" would
have been more apt as a subject line, but hopefully people
will understand the gist of my post.
- Justin
Boo is an interesting language made in C# that targets .Net. It's
compilable and has both static and duck-typing (I think it can be
interpreted too? Not sure..).
Take a look here:
http://boo.codehaus.org/
I don't see why it wouldn't be possible to do something like that in D.
On Sat, Aug 28, 20
As one who has an interest in developing dynamic languages, I'm
finding that implementing a DL which features both static and dynamic
typing in classical OO/imperative languages to be quite a challenge.
Recently I came across Microsoft's Dynamic Language Runtime (DLR).
This "is a runtime environ
