I remember using defineEnum a few times. From user perspective you have enum
names as
strings that forms a nasty mixin, not to mention you can't Ddoc single enum
values. It felt like
stone age. Then I took a look at how it's implemented and saw a bunch of
unreadable
templates glueing together
Tomek S.:
> I remember using defineEnum a few times.
Isn't it deprecated now?
Bye,
bearophile
bearophile napisał:
>> I remember using defineEnum a few times.
>
> Isn't it deprecated now?
Ah.. it is, got an old release.
Still, do you want my stuff?
--
Tomek
Tomek Sowiński napisał:
> enum Eh { Ah, Oh, Uh }// plain vanilla enum
> mixin EnumUtils!Eh; // that's all you need, magic happens here
Actually, you don't even need the mixin, just 2 functions...
--
Tomek
On 10/6/10 14:18 CDT, Tomek Sowiński wrote:
I remember using defineEnum a few times. From user perspective you have enum
names as
strings that forms a nasty mixin, not to mention you can't Ddoc single enum
values. It felt like
stone age. Then I took a look at how it's implemented and saw a bunc
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
> That's a good contribution, but I just deprecated enumToString in a
> recent commit because D's current introspection abilities made it easy
> to define parse and to!string to manipulate enum names.
>
> I'll be looking forward to other goodies!
Thanks, I just saw s
