Re: Is it possible that the Karmic upgrade interferes with dmd?

2009-10-30 Thread Don
Michael Mittner wrote: Walter Bright wrote: It could be that the C library routine strtold(), which the lexer relies on, changed. That has nothing to do with linking. Hmm. This is where dmd struggles: 641:[0x1.a5f1c2eb3fe4efp+73, 0x1.A5F1C2EB3FE4EFp-1, 74],// normal I have no

Re: Is it possible that the Karmic upgrade interferes with dmd?

2009-10-30 Thread Michael Mittner
Don wrote: That's odd. Please try adding an 'L' to end of each of each constant. [0x1.a5f1c2eb3fe4efp+73L, 0x1.A5F1C2EB3FE4EFp-1L, 74], Oh, I'm really sorry, I copied the wrong line (this was 640). Here's the guilty line (641, this time for real): [0x1.fa01712e8f0471ap-1064,

Is it possible that the Karmic upgrade interferes with dmd?

2009-10-29 Thread Michael Mittner
I've got a very strange problem and I wanted to ask if you guys have any ideas. Yesterday I compiled my project with dmd 1.041 and Tango and it worked. Today I compiled the same code again to get started (I sometimes like to just do a full rebuild to get started) and I get this message:

Re: Is it possible that the Karmic upgrade interferes with dmd?

2009-10-29 Thread Walter Bright
Michael Mittner wrote: I've got a very strange problem and I wanted to ask if you guys have any ideas. Yesterday I compiled my project with dmd 1.041 and Tango and it worked. Today I compiled the same code again to get started (I sometimes like to just do a full rebuild to get started) and I

Re: Is it possible that the Karmic upgrade interferes with dmd?

2009-10-29 Thread Michael Mittner
Walter Bright wrote: It could be that the C library routine strtold(), which the lexer relies on, changed. That has nothing to do with linking. Hmm. This is where dmd struggles: 641:[0x1.a5f1c2eb3fe4efp+73, 0x1.A5F1C2EB3FE4EFp-1, 74],// normal I have no idea how the lexer works,