Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> (Hi Jerry! Glad to see you're ramping up participation lately.) Yes,
> that's a bug. There are many other bugs related to jumps, including in
> switch statements.
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=4101
cheers,
Jerry
Andrei Alexandrescu Wrote:
> (Hi Jerry! Glad to see you're ramping up participation lately.) Yes,
> that's a bug. There are many other bugs related to jumps, including in
> switch statements.
>
That's why we need new properly scoped switch syntax, lol.
On 04/17/2010 11:11 AM, Jerry Quinn wrote:
In the spec it says that it's illegal to skip an initialization using goto.
Unless I'm mistaken, the code below does that for b, s, and c. However, it
compiles without complaint.
So, should the compiler be complaining, or is the text about goto real
In the spec it says that it's illegal to skip an initialization using goto.
Unless I'm mistaken, the code below does that for b, s, and c. However, it
compiles without complaint.
So, should the compiler be complaining, or is the text about goto really saying
that behavior is undefined. Obvio
