Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-20 Thread rikki cattermole via Digitalmars-d
On 21/10/2018 5:59 PM, solidstate1991 wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 13:08:50 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: and I don't want to go back to VisualD after VSCode for either a usable mago or VS native debug. Visual

Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-20 Thread solidstate1991 via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 13:08:50 UTC, Vladimir Panteleev wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: and I don't want to go back to VisualD after VSCode for either a usable mago or VS native debug. Visual Studio makes a decent stand-alone source-level

Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-04 Thread JN via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 23:51:38 UTC, tide wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 13:20:03 UTC, JN wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: Then I had a thought: Is there anything usable on the market besides these? It may not be enough for your

Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-03 Thread tide via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 13:20:03 UTC, JN wrote: On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: Then I had a thought: Is there anything usable on the market besides these? It may not be enough for your needs, but VSCode C++ debugger somewhat works for D. I can't

Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-03 Thread JN via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: Then I had a thought: Is there anything usable on the market besides these? It may not be enough for your needs, but VSCode C++ debugger somewhat works for D. I can't set breakpoints, but stepping through code works and

Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-03 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: https://x64dbg.com/#start I've tried it. It's not very good for source-level debugging. Seems to be primarily aimed at reverse-engineering / debugging programs you don't have the source for.

Re: Just found this debugger...

2018-10-03 Thread Vladimir Panteleev via Digitalmars-d
On Wednesday, 3 October 2018 at 03:25:04 UTC, solidstate1991 wrote: and I don't want to go back to VisualD after VSCode for either a usable mago or VS native debug. Visual Studio makes a decent stand-alone source-level debugger. Just select the .exe file, and right-click it in the

Just found this debugger...

2018-10-02 Thread solidstate1991 via Digitalmars-d
I wanted to do some work on lzbacon (D port of lzham-codec with some extras such as tarball support), but without a debugger it's pretty hard (I suspect an error in the multithreading when looking up for a value, or some C++ language quirk I missed). The current state of mago-mi is nearly