Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-20 Thread Christian Kamm
Don wrote: >> Adding exception support to LLVM is probably *much* easier than >> converting the exception support in a compiled object file. Walter Bright wrote: > There's no way to add it to a compiled object file. The schemes are > completely different, and interact with the rest of the code gen

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-20 Thread Walter Bright
Don wrote: Adding exception support to LLVM is probably *much* easier than converting the exception support in a compiled object file. There's no way to add it to a compiled object file. The schemes are completely different, and interact with the rest of the code generation. Might as well try

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-19 Thread Don
aarti_pl wrote: Christian Kamm pisze: Christian Kamm: No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd work if we used ELF for the object files and GCC for linking, but Windows people tell me this is hardly acceptable. dsimcha: I t

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-19 Thread aarti_pl
Christian Kamm pisze: Christian Kamm: No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd work if we used ELF for the object files and GCC for linking, but Windows people tell me this is hardly acceptable. dsimcha: I think this solution

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-19 Thread Christian Kamm
Christian Kamm: No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd work if we used ELF for the object files and GCC for linking, but Windows people tell me this is hardly acceptable. dsimcha: >>> I think this solution is

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-16 Thread Aarti_pl
Aarti_pl pisze: dsimcha pisze: == Quote from Christian Kamm (kamm-incasoftw...@removethis.de)'s article Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets fixed in the near future? No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pre

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-15 Thread Aarti_pl
dsimcha pisze: == Quote from Christian Kamm (kamm-incasoftw...@removethis.de)'s article Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets fixed in the near future? No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd wor

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-15 Thread Mosfet
Christian Kamm wrote: Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets fixed in the near future? No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd work if we used ELF for the object files and GCC for linking, but

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-14 Thread Jérôme M. Berger
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Bill Baxter wrote: > On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Christian Kamm > wrote: >>> Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets >>> fixed in the near future? >> No, unfortunately. >> >> It's a problem with LLVM only supporting

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-13 Thread dsimcha
== Quote from Christian Kamm (kamm-incasoftw...@removethis.de)'s article > > Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets > > fixed in the near future? > No, unfortunately. > It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm > pretty sure it'd work if

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-13 Thread Bill Baxter
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 7:55 AM, aarti_pl wrote: > Bill Baxter pisze: >> >> On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Christian Kamm >> wrote: Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets fixed in the near future? >>> >>> No, unfortunately. >>> >>> It's a problem wi

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-13 Thread aarti_pl
Bill Baxter pisze: On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Christian Kamm wrote: Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets fixed in the near future? No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd work if we used

Re: LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-13 Thread Bill Baxter
On Sun, Dec 14, 2008 at 5:13 AM, Christian Kamm wrote: >> Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets >> fixed in the near future? > > No, unfortunately. > > It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm > pretty sure it'd work if we used ELF for

LDC Windows exception handling

2008-12-13 Thread Christian Kamm
> Speaking of LDC, any chance that the exception handling on Win32 gets > fixed in the near future? No, unfortunately. It's a problem with LLVM only supporting Dwarf2 exception handling. I'm pretty sure it'd work if we used ELF for the object files and GCC for linking, but Windows people tell m