On Friday 29 October 2010 03:49:32 Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
> On 10/28/2010 04:45 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
> > Todd VanderVeen wrote:
> >> http://langpop.com/
> >>
> > Interesting that D comes first on Reddit with a reasonably
> >
> > comfortable margin ;)
>
> It's how they performed the
On 10/28/2010 04:45 PM, "Jérôme M. Berger" wrote:
Todd VanderVeen wrote:
http://langpop.com/
Interesting that D comes first on Reddit with a reasonably
comfortable margin ;)
It's how they performed the search. These stats are pure crap, because
"D" matches tons of miscellaneous stuf
Todd VanderVeen wrote:
> http://langpop.com/
Interesting that D comes first on Reddit with a reasonably
comfortable margin ;)
Jerome
--
mailto:jeber...@free.fr
http://jeberger.free.fr
Jabber: jeber...@jabber.fr
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 28/10/10 8:06 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
Todd VanderVeen wrote:
With regard to D, there seems to significant potential market/mind
share to be
had. There is the obvious space held by C and C++, but also in other
areas
where the specialized features of the other languages are not
required. I als
Todd VanderVeen wrote:
With regard to D, there seems to significant potential market/mind share to be
had. There is the obvious space held by C and C++, but also in other areas
where the specialized features of the other languages are not required. I also
find the surge in interest in Objective-C
I am moving this answer to a new post, as my intent was not to hijack the
lexer thread.
Tiobe and others have tried to determine language popularity by various means.
They are drawing inferences where no definitive data set exists. There is no
reason to treat these numbers as scientific results
