Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-31 Thread Chris
"Kagamin" > Chris Wrote: > >> You agree to indemnify Symantec from all claims or demands > > Note the use of "from" preposition. Indemnify from = defend, indemnify for > = compensate. Ok this could be a solution. Thanks to everybody.

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-31 Thread Steven Schveighoffer
On Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:08:29 -0400, Georg Wrede wrote: Or, while I know some istalling programs make you check a box stating you agree, but say you buy a PC with the OS already installed, and then start programming, say, using this PowerShell thingy, and the crap hits the fan -- because of so

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-31 Thread Georg Wrede
Kagamin wrote: BTW, how do you understand Microsoft EULA? "you will indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, that arise or result from the use or distribution of your Application" That's clear enough. You

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-31 Thread Kagamin
BTW, how do you understand Microsoft EULA? "you will indemnify, hold harmless, and defend Microsoft from and against any claims or lawsuits, including attorneys’ and experts’ fees, that arise or result from the use or distribution of your Application"

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-31 Thread Kagamin
Chris Wrote: > You agree to indemnify Symantec from all claims or demands Note the use of "from" preposition. Indemnify from = defend, indemnify for = compensate.

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Unknown W. Brackets
From my limited legal understanding, which being so limited can only be considered an unlearned opinion, I think that the clause "arising out of your use of the Software" limits the entire paragraph. Obviously, if I were to write a malicious virus in D, no one ought to sue Walter. They should

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Georg Wrede
Christopher Wright wrote: Chris wrote: Greetings to all ! I am evaluating D language for my next project (and immediatly loved it), but went to a screetching halt on the following licence term: "You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Digital Mars and Symantec, its subsidiaries, affiliates, d

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Christopher Wright
Chris wrote: Greetings to all ! I am evaluating D language for my next project (and immediatly loved it), but went to a screetching halt on the following licence term: "You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Digital Mars and Symantec, its subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employe

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Walter Bright
Chris wrote: "Sean Kelly" Chris wrote: "You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Digital Mars and Symantec, its subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees and agents harmless from all claims or demands made against them (and any related losses, damages, expenses and costs) arising

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Chris
"Sean Kelly" > Chris wrote: >> "You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Digital Mars and Symantec, its >> subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees and agents >> harmless from all claims or demands made against them (and any related >> losses, damages, expenses and costs) arising out

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Chris
"Unknown W. Brackets" > That is a very common clause. The idea, as far as I understand, is that > if the compiler were to break - and your client were to sue you because of > this - you can't sue down the chain. I am familiar with the clause you are talking about (and I basically agree with it),

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Sean Kelly
Chris wrote: Greetings to all ! I am evaluating D language for my next project (and immediatly loved it), but went to a screetching halt on the following licence term: "You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Digital Mars and Symantec, its subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employe

Re: Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Unknown W. Brackets
That is a very common clause. The idea, as far as I understand, is that if the compiler were to break - and your client were to sue you because of this - you can't sue down the chain. From the same directory, readme.txt: "The optimizer and code generator sources are covered under a separate l

Licence question about Indemnification

2009-03-30 Thread Chris
Greetings to all ! I am evaluating D language for my next project (and immediatly loved it), but went to a screetching halt on the following licence term: "You agree to defend, indemnify and hold Digital Mars and Symantec, its subsidiaries, affiliates, directors, officers, employees and agents