On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 14:05, deadalnix wrote:
>> The limitation is I'm not sure that would work for class templates
>> hierarchies.
>
> Sounds nice ! I'm pretty sure this has some limitations, but that
> definitively a step forward.
>
> I'll do some tests about that.
>
> If the getDerived isn't
Le 25/09/2011 21:30, Philippe Sigaud a écrit :
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 20:02, deadalnix wrote:
I think what he wants is to have automatically generated unittests for
derived classes that check if the unittests of the parent still pass for
them. I don't know of a nice way to do that without requ
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 20:02, deadalnix wrote:
>> I think what he wants is to have automatically generated unittests for
>> derived classes that check if the unittests of the parent still pass for
>> them. I don't know of a nice way to do that without requiring some
>> minimal effort by the imple
I think what he wants is to have automatically generated unittests for
derived classes that check if the unittests of the parent still pass for
them. I don't know of a nice way to do that without requiring some
minimal effort by the implementor of the derived class. Contracts
quickly detect and r
On 09/23/2011 10:17 PM, Max Klyga wrote:
On 2011-09-23 12:55:25 +0300, deadalnix said:
I recently faced a problem in java. I have lots of classes
inheriting from the same superclass. Thoses classes has to conform to
some behaviour expected when manipulation the superclass as Liskov
subs
On 2011-09-23 12:55:25 +0300, deadalnix said:
I recently faced a problem in java. I have lots of classes
inheriting from the same superclass. Thoses classes has to conform to
some behaviour expected when manipulation the superclass as Liskov
substitution principle says.
This is defin
class Superclass
{
abstract int do_some_stuff();
abstract int do_some_other_stuff();
}
class Foo1 : Superclass
class Foo2 : Superclass
class Foo3 : Superclass
unittest
{
// get an instance of all classes
Superclass[] instances = [new Foo1(), new Foo2(), new Foo3
The only thing that D unittest do, is executing code if you
pass -unittest to the compiler. What you do in this code is entirely
up to you.
So, I think the answer is no. No you can't do this with
the current language and standard library.
When I started learning D, I thought the way D handles u
I recently faced a problem in java. I have lots of classes
inheriting from the same superclass. Thoses classes has to conform to
some behaviour expected when manipulation the superclass as Liskov
substitution principle says.
This is definitvelly hard to achieve. Solution promoted on th
