I've raised https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378 to critical.
Please chime in with ideas for a good solution. Thanks! -- Andrei
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:34:51 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I've raised https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378 to
critical. Please chime in with ideas for a good solution.
Thanks! -- Andrei
What about requiring all local imports to be statically imported?
module a;
int
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 11:34:51AM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> I've raised https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378 to critical.
> Please chime in with ideas for a good solution. Thanks! -- Andrei
I can think of a few:
1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled
On 9/23/14, 11:48 AM, Meta wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:34:51 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
I've raised https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378 to
critical. Please chime in with ideas for a good solution. Thanks! --
Andrei
What about requiring all local imports to be sta
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
I can think of a few:
1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled in by local
import are
found last. Walter has stated that he disagrees with this
approach
because it complicates symbol lookup rules.
2) Emit
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:56:56PM +, Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
> >I can think of a few:
> >
> >1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled in by local import are
> >found last. Walter has stated that h
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled in by local
import are
found last. Walter has stated that he disagrees with this
approach
because it complicates symbol lookup rules.
This.
On 9/23/14, 12:01 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:56:56PM +, Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
I can think of a few:
1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled in by local i
On Tue, 23 Sep 2014 11:50:22 -0700
"H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d" wrote:
> (3) will likely cause backlash because it will break a LOT
> of code that currently compiles and likely to have no actual
> problems.
we always can make a deprecation warning first.
(dreaming) i want wildcard/regexp impor
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:06:26PM -0700, Andrei Alexandrescu via Digitalmars-d
wrote:
> On 9/23/14, 12:01 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 06:56:56PM +, Meta via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> >>On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmar
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 19:18:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
But this would cause a compile error:
mod.d
module mod;
string x, y;
main.d
void main() {
int x, y, z;
import mod;
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 07:47:59PM +, monarch_dodra via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 19:18:08 UTC, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d
> wrote:
> >But this would cause a compile error:
> >
> > mod.d
> > module mod;
> > string x, y;
> >
> > main.d-
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 20:10:35 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Sounds reasonable. How would that be implemented, though?
Currently, in
the compiler, lookup is implemented via a linked list of Scope
objects
that contain, among other things, a symbol table for the symbols
decl
Andrei Alexandrescu:
I've raised https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378 to
critical. Please chime in with ideas for a good solution.
Thanks! -- Andrei
I think this code:
import foo;
void main() {}
should import only the "foo" identifier in the current
module/scope (or fail to do so
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled in by local
import are
found last. Walter has stated that he disagrees with this
approach
because it complicates symbol lookup rules.
That is dead simple compared
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 19:03:28 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
Good luck convincing Walter, then. :-( Or maybe if we can
convince
Andrei to twist his arm hard enough... :-P
In SDC? doing this represent ~30 lines on a 600+ line identifier
resolution (plus several other hun
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:34:51 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
I've raised https://issues.dlang.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10378 to
critical. Please chime in with ideas for a good solution.
Thanks! -- Andrei
In the meantime, anybody who wants to know if their code is
vulnerable to this pr
On 09/23/2014 10:19 PM, monarch_dodra wrote:
As I said, local imports, IMO, should behave in all aspects as a global
import. It simply only exists during its scope, but is not actually any
more "internal" than the rest. If a local import creates a symbol
ambiguity, then it's ambiguous, and compi
On 09/23/2014 09:01 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Tuesday, 23 September 2014 at 18:52:13 UTC, H. S. Teoh via
Digitalmars-d wrote:
1) Change lookup rules so that symbols pulled in by local import are
found last. Walter has stated that he disagrees with this approach
because it complicates symbol
19 matches
Mail list logo
