Daniel Murphy Wrote:
> "Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
> news:j4gflo$1c59$1...@digitalmars.com...
> > I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach.
> > I suspect a big part of the reason it's stagnated is because it's
> > difficult to update to new versions of DM
On 2011-09-12 03:35, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:j4j4al$il3$1...@digitalmars.com...
Virtual functions needs to be mangled as well. The only thing that, at
least I know about, differs from a free function and a static member
function is the mangling.
--
/Jacob Ca
On 11.09.2011 17:07, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:j4i33b$1bc2$1...@digitalmars.com...
I find this strange:
D can call C++ free functions and virtual member functions but it cannot
call non-virtual or static member functions.
Especially not be able to call static
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:j4j4al$il3$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Virtual functions needs to be mangled as well. The only thing that, at
> least I know about, differs from a free function and a static member
> function is the mangling.
>
> --
> /Jacob Carlborg
Virtual functions neve
On 2011-09-11 17:07, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:j4i33b$1bc2$1...@digitalmars.com...
I find this strange:
D can call C++ free functions and virtual member functions but it cannot
call non-virtual or static member functions.
Especially not be able to call static
"Jacob Carlborg" wrote in message
news:j4i33b$1bc2$1...@digitalmars.com...
> I find this strange:
>
> D can call C++ free functions and virtual member functions but it cannot
> call non-virtual or static member functions.
>
> Especially not be able to call static member functions are strange. I
On 2011-09-11 06:08, Daniel Murphy wrote:
"Nick Sabalausky" wrote in message
news:j4gflo$1c59$1...@digitalmars.com...
I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach.
I suspect a big part of the reason it's stagnated is because it's
difficult to update to new versions o
"dolive" wrote in message
news:j4f55s$1r9p$1...@digitalmars.com...
> Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd.
>
Yea, that would be really nice.
I'm wondering if maybe the problem is that it needs a different approach. I
suspect a big part of the reason it's
Looking forward to the resurrection ddmd.
thank's all
dolive
