On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 2:57 AM, Fawzi Mohamed wrote:
> On 2009-10-16 11:13:59 +0200, gzp said:
>
>> language_fan írta:
>>>
>>> Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:04:09 -0400, Chad J thusly wrote:
>>>
I'm reminded of how annoying it is when there are different libraries
for a language that all define
On 2009-10-16 11:13:59 +0200, gzp said:
language_fan írta:
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:04:09 -0400, Chad J thusly wrote:
I'm reminded of how annoying it is when there are different libraries
for a language that all define their mathematical types differently and
in incompatible ways (all of the Vec2
language_fan írta:
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:04:09 -0400, Chad J thusly wrote:
I'm reminded of how annoying it is when there are different libraries
for a language that all define their mathematical types differently and
in incompatible ways (all of the Vec2D, Vec3D, etc ever). Also
aggravating is w
On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 4:36 AM, Don wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, dsimcha wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm working on some mathy modules that I'd like to eventually contribute
>>> to
>>> Phobos, or, if they're too niche, to a standalone lib.
>>> One that I've alluded
>>> t
Bill Baxter wrote:
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I'm working on some mathy modules that I'd like to eventually contribute to
Phobos, or, if they're too niche, to a standalone lib.
One that I've alluded
to here in the past few days is MathExp. Basically what it does is
parse/i
On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 2:49 PM, dsimcha wrote:
> I'm working on some mathy modules that I'd like to eventually contribute to
> Phobos, or, if they're too niche, to a standalone lib.
> One that I've alluded
> to here in the past few days is MathExp. Basically what it does is
> parse/interpret/eva
On 2009-10-14 23:49:07 +0200, dsimcha said:
I'm working on some mathy modules that I'd like to eventually contribute to
Phobos, or, if they're too niche, to a standalone lib. One that I've alluded
to here in the past few days is MathExp. Basically what it does is
parse/interpret/evaluate/mani
Thu, 15 Oct 2009 02:04:09 -0400, Chad J thusly wrote:
> I'm reminded of how annoying it is when there are different libraries
> for a language that all define their mathematical types differently and
> in incompatible ways (all of the Vec2D, Vec3D, etc ever). Also
> aggravating is when there is o
I'm reminded of how annoying it is when there are different libraries
for a language that all define their mathematical types differently and
in incompatible ways (all of the Vec2D, Vec3D, etc ever). Also
aggravating is when there is one canonical type that everyone uses, but
it is a poor choice (
I'm working on some mathy modules that I'd like to eventually contribute to
Phobos, or, if they're too niche, to a standalone lib. One that I've alluded
to here in the past few days is MathExp. Basically what it does is
parse/interpret/evaluate/manipulate mathematical expressions at runtime.
Here
10 matches
Mail list logo
