Re: More on StringToken

2010-06-24 Thread Simen kjaeraas
Ben Hanson wrote: It seems like the best way to go is to use dchar for strings (i.e. not have the struct as a template) as I need real characters for intersection purposes. When it comes to lookup, any input will need converting to dchars (I expect this can be done on the fly). In C++ yo

Re: More on StringToken

2010-06-24 Thread Ellery Newcomer
On 06/24/2010 06:35 AM, Ben Hanson wrote: It seems like the best way to go is to use dchar for strings (i.e. not have the struct as a template) as I need real characters for intersection purposes. When it comes to lookup, any input will need converting to dchars (I expect this can be done on the

Re: More on StringToken

2010-06-24 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Thu, 24 Jun 2010 11:35:50 +, Ben Hanson wrote: > It seems like the best way to go is to use dchar for strings (i.e. not > have the struct as a template) as I need real characters for > intersection purposes. When it comes to lookup, any input will need > converting to dchars (I expect this

More on StringToken

2010-06-24 Thread Ben Hanson
It seems like the best way to go is to use dchar for strings (i.e. not have the struct as a template) as I need real characters for intersection purposes. When it comes to lookup, any input will need converting to dchars (I expect this can be done on the fly). In C++ you would use iterators to do