On Friday, 4 May 2018 at 20:27:33 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
The dmd package on NixOS doesn't work anymore in their master
branch.
They must have changed something in the C environment or
something and I don't have a clue what's going on.
I found the problem.
strip in binutils 2.30 is broken. Ni
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 13:15:35 UTC, Johannes Pfau wrote:
As far as I know, that's correct. GCC-based compilers emit ASM
code only and leave assembling of the objects files to the
'binutils as' assembler. That's probably the reason they
assumed it's a binutils bug. For DMD, binutils is not i
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 11:28:30 UTC, Mike Franklin wrote:
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 10:28:37 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 04:27:20 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
My suspicion about the switch to glibc 2.27 being the problem
was wrong.
I did a very timeconsuming bisection and
On Friday, 18 May 2018 at 10:28:37 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 04:27:20 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
My suspicion about the switch to glibc 2.27 being the problem
was wrong.
I did a very timeconsuming bisection and found the problem
commit to be the one which bumped binutils
On Friday, 11 May 2018 at 04:27:20 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
My suspicion about the switch to glibc 2.27 being the problem
was wrong.
I did a very timeconsuming bisection and found the problem
commit to be the one which bumped binutils to 2.30.
Can somebody help me to answer the question from
On Wednesday, 9 May 2018 at 19:58:48 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
Now I wonder how something like that is possible.
My suspicion about the switch to glibc 2.27 being the problem was
wrong.
I did a very timeconsuming bisection and found the problem commit
to be the one which bumped binutils to 2.3
On Friday, 4 May 2018 at 20:27:33 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
The dmd package on NixOS doesn't work anymore in their master
branch.
Since dmd still works correctly on the stable branch I tried to
examine the differences of libphobos2.a.
I switched back to version 2.079.0 on master to have the sam
On Tuesday, 8 May 2018 at 14:45:53 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
On Saturday, 5 May 2018 at 11:22:06 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
I also need to skip through changes which might have
introduced this problem.
Has anyone tried to compile with glibc 2.27?
They switched to 2.27 on Master branch and I suspe
On Saturday, 5 May 2018 at 11:22:06 UTC, Thomas Mader wrote:
I also need to skip through changes which might have introduced
this problem.
Has anyone tried to compile with glibc 2.27?
They switched to 2.27 on Master branch and I suspect that the
error has to do with that.
On Saturday, 5 May 2018 at 00:07:01 UTC, Johannes Loher wrote:
Am 04.05.2018 um 22:27 schrieb Thomas Mader:
[...]
Here is a demangled version of what you posted:
Here comes the entire demangled output of the Hello World build.
Maybe it has something to do with ModuleInfo?
I also need to skip
Am 04.05.2018 um 22:27 schrieb Thomas Mader:
> [...]
Here is a demangled version of what you posted:
dmd hello.d
hello.o: In function `@safe void
std.stdio.writeln!(immutable(char)[]).writeln(immutable(char)[])':
hello.d:(.text.@safe void
std.stdio.writeln!(immutable(char)[]).writeln(immutable(cha
The dmd package on NixOS doesn't work anymore in their master
branch.
They must have changed something in the C environment or
something and I don't have a clue what's going on.
Building the package succeeds but when I try to build with the
newly build binary I get all sorts of linker errors.
M
12 matches
Mail list logo
