On Sunday, 16 December 2012 at 01:04:44 UTC, Rob T wrote:
There's an interesting discussion going on that may be related
to this subject.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2705.1355596709.5162.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
Note the definition with the "hidden reference frame" baggage,
and t
There's an interesting discussion going on that may be related to
this subject.
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2705.1355596709.5162.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
Note the definition with the "hidden reference frame" baggage,
and to get rid of the extra baggage use "static struct".
The r
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 09:47:18 UTC, Rob T wrote:
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 07:39:33 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Unfortunately it seems we have to make an assignment.
A.B!(0) b = a.b1;
This one tries to call a constructor that takes in a
typeof(a.b1). Do you have a constructor for it?
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 07:39:33 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Unfortunately it seems we have to make an assignment.
A.B!(0) b = a.b1;
This one tries to call a constructor that takes in a
typeof(a.b1). Do you have a constructor for it?
does not work but
A.B!(0) b;
b = a.b1;
does. Not sure i
http://dpaste.dzfl.pl/64025e0a
contains updated code. When the offset of the struct is 0 it
contains an actual ptr to the class(the standard way) and hence
can be "orphaned". When the offset is not 0 then it is part of a
class object and can use a calculation to get the parent.
Both methods
On Friday, 14 December 2012 at 06:27:39 UTC, Rob T wrote:
I guess the complicating factor is that a nested struct could
not be copied out of one class into another of a different
type, so I can see why it's not implemented. The compiler would
have to prevent copies out, or the language would ha
I guess the complicating factor is that a nested struct could not
be copied out of one class into another of a different type, so I
can see why it's not implemented. The compiler would have to
prevent copies out, or the language would have to be modified to
allow nesting but with some new conve
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 20:56:05 UTC, Mafi wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:58:47 UTC, Max Samukha
wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:19:54 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Also, I initially tried to do
B!(A.b1.offsetof) b1;
a'la
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:58:47 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:19:54 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Also, I initially tried to do
B!(A.b1.offsetof) b1;
a'la
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2627.1355335532.5162.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
but dmd 2.
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 08:55:44 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
It would be nice if D implements such a feature because it will
look more natural.
It sure would be nice. With D, you should not have to mess around
with a pointer like this.
Anyway, thanks for your efforts, we at least have a "ha
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 01:57:26 UTC, d coder wrote:
The name doesn't matter. I just wanted to annoy Walter again
with yet
another bit of evidence that completeness of a feature is
important even if
it doesn't seem to have an obvious use case. People will do
what is logical
and end up
> The name doesn't matter. I just wanted to annoy Walter again with yet
>> another bit of evidence that completeness of a feature is important even if
>> it doesn't seem to have an obvious use case. People will do what is logical
>> and end up with hacks like that.
>>
>
I believe it *is* an obvious
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 00:37:16 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 00:02:01 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Half done? Has it even been implemented at all?
http://dlang.org/class.html#nested
It is implemented for nested classes but not structs.
In any case my method se
On Thursday, 13 December 2012 at 00:02:01 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Half done? Has it even been implemented at all?
http://dlang.org/class.html#nested
It is implemented for nested classes but not structs.
In any case my method seems to provide a solution to the
problem in the mean time. I have
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:58:47 UTC, Max Samukha wrote:
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:19:54 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Also, I initially tried to do
B!(A.b1.offsetof) b1;
a'la
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2627.1355335532.5162.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
but dmd 2.
On Wednesday, 12 December 2012 at 22:19:54 UTC, js.mdnq wrote:
Also, I initially tried to do
B!(A.b1.offsetof) b1;
a'la
http://forum.dlang.org/thread/mailman.2627.1355335532.5162.digitalmar...@puremagic.com
but dmd 2.060 crashes, which is why I moved on to using a
static if.
That's
Here is a solution I came up with that seems to work fine and
does not require hard coding any values. Hence, it is useable.
Unfortunately it looks clunky and is: (and it would be nice to
speed up the the method call and possible code it in such a way
that if D directly supports this in the fut
17 matches
Mail list logo
