I ran into a strange and hard-to-describe problem with nested functions
closing over the argument to their enclosing function.
When a nested function (A) returns the value of another nested function
(B) that returns a parameter of the enclosing function (C), and when (A)
is returned from (C)
On 3/30/2012 1:13 PM, Ed McCardell wrote:
I ran into a strange and hard-to-describe problem with nested functions closing
over the argument to their enclosing function.
When a nested function (A) returns the value of another nested function (B) that
returns a parameter of the enclosing function
On 3/30/12, Ed McCardell wrote:
> The code below demonstrates this (using DMD 2.058, no optimizations). Is
> this a bug?
You mean the result is 55 when you uncomment "return &nested;"? All
asserts pass for me when I use that return. Otherwise when using
"return &escaping;" I get:
1244764
1244764
On 03/30/2012 04:51 PM, Andrej Mitrovic wrote:
You mean the result is 55 when you uncomment "return&nested;"? All
asserts pass for me when I use that return. Otherwise when using
"return&escaping;" I get:
1244764
1244764
4202631
2.058 win32.
On 64-bit linux, the first two asserts always pass
On 03/30/2012 04:45 PM, Walter Bright wrote:
On 3/30/2012 1:13 PM, Ed McCardell wrote:
The code below demonstrates this (using DMD 2.058, no optimizations).
Is this a
bug?
Looks like one. Please report this to
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/enter_bug.cgi?product=D
Done:
http://d.puremagic.c
