Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-29 Thread Piotr Szturmaj
Don Clugston wrote: On 25/06/12 20:04, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 16:09:43 UTC, Felix Hufnagel wrote: +1 for hashes into std.hash and cryptographic primitives into std.crypto and we should have a std.net (std.uri, std.socket, std.socketstream , std.net.curl, ...), std.io.

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-29 Thread Don Clugston
On 25/06/12 20:04, Jesse Phillips wrote: On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 16:09:43 UTC, Felix Hufnagel wrote: +1 for hashes into std.hash and cryptographic primitives into std.crypto and we should have a std.net (std.uri, std.socket, std.socketstream , std.net.curl, ...), std.io. for (Outbuffer, file

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Jesse Phillips
On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 16:09:43 UTC, Felix Hufnagel wrote: +1 for hashes into std.hash and cryptographic primitives into std.crypto and we should have a std.net (std.uri, std.socket, std.socketstream , std.net.curl, ...), std.io. for (Outbuffer, file, ) and probably std.database or som

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Dmitry Olshansky
On 25-Jun-12 20:09, Felix Hufnagel wrote: +1 for hashes into std.hash and cryptographic primitives into std.crypto Another +1 here and we should have std.net (std.uri, std.socket, std.socketstream , std.net.curl, ...), std.io for proper I/O framework. and probably std.data or something like t

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread nazriel
On Monday, 25 June 2012 at 16:09:43 UTC, Felix Hufnagel wrote: +1 for hashes into std.hash and cryptographic primitives into std.crypto and we should have a std.net (std.uri, std.socket, std.socketstream , std.net.curl, ...), std.io. for (Outbuffer, file, ) and probably std.database or som

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Felix Hufnagel
+1 for hashes into std.hash and cryptographic primitives into std.crypto and we should have a std.net (std.uri, std.socket, std.socketstream , std.net.curl, ...), std.io. for (Outbuffer, file, ) and probably std.database or something like that for (csv, json, xml, ...) ... Am 25.06.2012

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Monday, June 25, 2012 12:24:44 Piotr Szturmaj wrote: > Jonathan M Davis wrote: > > On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:35:33 Johannes Pfau wrote: > >> OK, so I understand std.util is probably not a good idea. > >> > >> So the candidates for the namespace are: > >> * std.crypto.hash > >> * std.checksum

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Jacob Carlborg
On 2012-06-25 12:24, Piotr Szturmaj wrote: Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:35:33 Johannes Pfau wrote: OK, so I understand std.util is probably not a good idea. So the candidates for the namespace are: * std.crypto.hash * std.checksum * std.crypto.hash and std.checksum * std

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Piotr Szturmaj
Jonathan M Davis wrote: On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:35:33 Johannes Pfau wrote: OK, so I understand std.util is probably not a good idea. So the candidates for the namespace are: * std.crypto.hash * std.checksum * std.crypto.hash and std.checksum * std.hash and the same with hash replaced by di

Re: New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Jonathan M Davis
On Monday, June 25, 2012 11:35:33 Johannes Pfau wrote: > OK, so I understand std.util is probably not a good idea. > > So the candidates for the namespace are: > * std.crypto.hash > * std.checksum > * std.crypto.hash and std.checksum > * std.hash > > and the same with hash replaced by digest. > S

New hash API: namespace

2012-06-25 Thread Johannes Pfau
OK, so I understand std.util is probably not a good idea. So the candidates for the namespace are: * std.crypto.hash * std.checksum * std.crypto.hash and std.checksum * std.hash and the same with hash replaced by digest. So which one should we use?