Hello,
I am not really confident on this one, but could D be interfaced
with Nginx ?
It would be nice to replace python but if not easily doable, then
it is a no-no for me.
Any clue on it ?
Thanks
Let me add a bit more of context : I currently use UWSGI but I
would like to accelerate python replacing it with D.
Less memory consumption and so on..
I need something as robust as uwsgi.
If there is none, then, no go. :)
Thanks !
On 2013-12-20 21:21:22 +, Larry said:
Hello,
I am not really confident on this one, but could D be interfaced with Nginx ?
It would be nice to replace python but if not easily doable, then it is
a no-no for me.
Any clue on it ?
Thanks
Sure you can. There are three options:
1. Make ng
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 21:21:23 UTC, Larry wrote:
Hello,
I am not really confident on this one, but could D be
interfaced with Nginx ?
It would be nice to replace python but if not easily doable,
then it is a no-no for me.
Any clue on it ?
Thanks
http://dicebot-old.blogspot.co.u
Ok,
thanks you answered while I was typing :)
Thanks !
Now, the next question : are those implementations robust ?
Do they bite (are they reliable )?
Do many people use it ?
Remember, I am coming from python where everything is easy and am
already learning D and decided to give it a jump.
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 21:32:57 UTC, Larry wrote:
Let me add a bit more of context : I currently use UWSGI but I
would like to accelerate python replacing it with D.
Less memory consumption and so on..
I need something as robust as uwsgi.
If there is none, then, no go. :)
Thanks !
Now,
I assume that it is very fast. But there are no benchmarks under
heavy loads.
It seems very good but not really commonly used.
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 21:38:20 UTC, Larry wrote:
Do many people use it ?
Not many, as not many people use D in general. No negative
feedback from those who have tried so far though ;) You may want
to contact developer(s) directly via
http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejected
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 21:44:11 UTC, Larry wrote:
Now,
I assume that it is very fast. But there are no benchmarks
under heavy loads.
It seems very good but not really commonly used.
Probably only current information about vibe.d performance is
this article :
https://atilanevesonco
Thanks a lot !
You are all wonderful and helpful
On Friday, 20 December 2013 at 21:32:23 UTC, Max Klyga wrote:
2. Make a D fastcgi process and point nginx to it. There is
Adam Ruppe's cgi.d implementation for example.
Yeah, my cgi.d can interface with nginx through fastcgi, scgi, or
reverse proxy pretty well.
Though my code doesn't scale a
On Fri, 2013-12-20 at 22:44 +0100, Larry wrote:
> Now,
>
> I assume that it is very fast. But there are no benchmarks under
> heavy loads.
>
> It seems very good but not really commonly used.
Well it is relatively new, and not many people know about D and fewer
about Vibe.d. If you use it other
Being one of the pioneers won't make me cry.
I had a look at it. This project seems like it deserves a bit
more work :
http://forum.rejectedsoftware.com/groups/rejectedsoftware.vibed/thread/7556/
This is particularly annoying and a show stopper for me.
I will definitely look for its evolution
On Saturday, 21 December 2013 at 21:15:19 UTC, Larry wrote:
But when I look at UWSGI, it is directly tied to nginx so no
need
to manage yet another server and so on. It just works as is,
redirects to the app and boom, executes the script.
There is no practical difference - uWSGI has own protoc
15 matches
Mail list logo
