On Mon, 12 Mar 2012 20:28:15 -0400, H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx
wrote:
Hmph.
I tried this code:
import std.stdio;
struct A {
int[] data;
int opApply(int delegate(ref int) dg) {
foreach (d; data) {
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 03:03:39AM -0400, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.455.1331448575.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by
incompetence. -- Napoleon Bonaparte
Pardon
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 06:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:29:01AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suppose you have a delegate literal and immediately call it:
auto a = x + (){ doStuff(); return y; }() + z;
Does DMD ever (or always?) optimize away a delegate if it's
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 12:15:02AM +0100, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 06:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:29:01AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suppose you have a delegate literal and immediately call it:
auto a = x + (){ doStuff(); return y; }()
On 3/12/2012 4:15 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 06:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:29:01AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suppose you have a delegate literal and immediately call it:
auto a = x + (){ doStuff(); return y; }() + z;
Does DMD ever
Peter Alexander peter.alexander...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:thetmhnnbeepmxgus...@forum.dlang.org...
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 06:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:29:01AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suppose you have a delegate literal and immediately call it:
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote in message
news:mailman.582.1331607753.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
On 3/12/2012 4:15 PM, Peter Alexander wrote:
On Sunday, 11 March 2012 at 06:49:27 UTC, H. S. Teoh wrote:
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:29:01AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suppose
On 3/12/2012 8:10 PM, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Brad Roberts bra...@puremagic.com wrote:
See also: bug 4440
The patch in there, if it hasn't bit rotten to badly (I suspect it has)
will handle _this_ case. But almost no other
case of inlining delegates.
It'd be a good area for someone who
Suppose you have a delegate literal and immediately call it:
auto a = x + (){ doStuff(); return y; }() + z;
Does DMD ever (or always?) optimize away a delegate if it's executed
immediately and never stored into a variable? If not, can it, and would it
be a simple change? Is something like this
On Sun, Mar 11, 2012 at 01:29:01AM -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Suppose you have a delegate literal and immediately call it:
auto a = x + (){ doStuff(); return y; }() + z;
Does DMD ever (or always?) optimize away a delegate if it's executed
immediately and never stored into a variable? If
H. S. Teoh hst...@quickfur.ath.cx wrote in message
news:mailman.455.1331448575.4860.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Never ascribe to malice that which is adequately explained by
incompetence. -- Napoleon Bonaparte
Pardon me veering offtopic at one of your taglines yet again, but I have to
11 matches
Mail list logo
