Re: Paid support

2012-12-18 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 18 December 2012 14:25, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 12/18/2012 02:43 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> You mean, the Ballmer peak for blood alcohol concentration? >> > > Yes, experimental confirmation of this would be welcome. :-) > > Get me a year's supply of

Re: Paid support

2012-12-18 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 12/18/2012 02:43 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: You mean, the Ballmer peak for blood alcohol concentration? Yes, experimental confirmation of this would be welcome. :-)

Re: Paid support

2012-12-18 Thread Iain Buclaw
On 18 December 2012 13:23, Joseph Rushton Wakeling < joseph.wakel...@webdrake.net> wrote: > On 12/18/2012 01:40 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: > >> I only accept beer payments. :o) >> > > Bounties going on your tab at your pub(s) of choice? :-) > > Is there an optimal pints:work ratio that we should take

Re: Paid support

2012-12-18 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 12/18/2012 01:40 PM, Iain Buclaw wrote: I only accept beer payments. :o) Bounties going on your tab at your pub(s) of choice? :-) Is there an optimal pints:work ratio that we should take into account?

Re: Paid support

2012-12-18 Thread Iain Buclaw
y any particular release. (One >> possibility is >> to do so as part of paid support for large corporate users.) That means >> there >> needs to be one branch per release. >> > > ... made me think: besides corporate support, what are the thoughts on > some kind

Paid support

2012-12-18 Thread Joseph Rushton Wakeling
On 12/16/2012 04:05 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote: Just one tidbit of information: I talked to Walter and we want to build into the process the ability to modify any particular release. (One possibility is to do so as part of paid support for large corporate users.) That means there needs to be