bearophile wrote:
> Tim M:
>> Oh now this will never fail but you can never be too sure.<
>
> In the last thousand years humans have invented a thing named
> "mathematics". In certain circumstances it allows you to be certain of
> some things. In some part of the programs you can use this (simple)
Tim M:
>Oh now this will never fail but you can never be too sure.<
In the last thousand years humans have invented a thing named "mathematics". In
certain circumstances it allows you to be certain of some things. In some part
of the programs you can use this (simple) mathematics and be actually
But that's the main problem. Oh now this will never fail but you can never
be too sure. Also 640K should be enough for anyone. :)
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 14:26:37 +1300, BCS wrote:
Reply to tim,
I haven't tried safeD and i'm guessing that is extra secure version of
D but what would be the poi
Reply to tim,
I haven't tried safeD and i'm guessing that is extra secure version of
D but what would be the point in removing those secuirty checks?
I think it implication is that some checks can be removed if you can show
that they will never fail.
I haven't tried safeD and i'm guessing that is extra secure version of D
but what would be the point in removing those secuirty checks?
On Wed, 17 Dec 2008 08:34:17 +1300, bearophile
wrote:
This article shows a way to remove lot of array bounds checks, it's not
the first of this kind, bu
This article shows a way to remove lot of array bounds checks, it's not the
first of this kind, but this method seems simple enough.
"Array Bounds Check Elimination for the Java HotSpot Client Compiler"
By Thomas Würthinger, Christian Wimmer and Hanspeter Mössenböck:
http://www.ssw.uni-linz.ac.at
