On 01/22/2016 09:48 AM, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 20:42:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
I disagree. Making an
On 01/22/2016 09:48 AM, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 20:42:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
I disagree. Making an
On 2016-01-22 23:00, Ilya wrote:
DIP please! --Ilya
http://forum.dlang.org/post/n8024o$dlj$1...@digitalmars.com
--
/Jacob Carlborg
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 17:09:01 UTC, Jacob Carlborg wrote:
On 2016-01-21 20:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
[...]
Can we just implement a basic form of named parameters that
remove the ugly workaround that Flag is.
void a(int x);
a(x: 3); // error, cannot be called with named paramete
On 2016-01-21 20:31, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
Can somebody please c
On Friday, 22 January 2016 at 14:48:47 UTC, Marc Schütz wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 20:42:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer
wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is
unnecessary, unhelpful, and wasteful.
I
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 20:42:17 UTC, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
I disagree. Making an alias means the user does not have to
impor
On 01/21/2016 03:42 PM, Jack Stouffer wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
I disagree. Making an alias means the user does not have to import
std.typecons in their
On 01/21/2016 04:58 PM, H. S. Teoh via Digitalmars-d wrote:
auto myFunc(T)(T data, Flag!"replaceArrayWithPointer" replaceArrayWithPointer =
Flag!"replaceArrayWithPointer".Yes)
{ ... }
auto myFunc(T)(T data,
Flag!"replaceArrayWithPointer" flag = Yes.replaceArrayWithPointer)
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 08:42:17PM +, Jack Stouffer via Digitalmars-d wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> >* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
> >unhelpful, and wasteful.
>
> I disagree. Making an alias means the user d
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 20:42:56 UTC, jmh530 wrote:
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei
Alexandrescu wrote:
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"fro
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wastef
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
I disagree. Making an alias means the user does not have to
import std.typecons in their code, and as a purely subjective
measure, R
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wastef
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wastef
On Thursday, 21 January 2016 at 19:31:19 UTC, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wastef
The correct idiom involving Flag is:
* Use the name Flag!"frob" for the type of the flag
* Use Yes.frob and No.frob for the flag values
* Do NOT alias Flag!"frob" to a new name. This is unnecessary,
unhelpful, and wasteful.
Can somebody please change the respective code in std.experimental.n
17 matches
Mail list logo
