Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
Andrei
Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
M Davis's std.unittests.
Andrei
On 2/8/11 4:29 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
As I stated in the assertNotThrown thread, I don't see any reason why
this shouldn't be included if it's helpful for other
"Andrei Alexandrescu" wrote in message
news:iirnm1$28ig$4...@digitalmars.com...
> Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan M
> Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
>
> Andrei
"YES"
Andrei Alexandrescu napisał:
> Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
> M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
I'm in two minds. Since Jonathan has improved collectException the proposed
function is just a short-hand for:
auto e = collectException
On 02/08/2011 06:29 PM, David Nadlinger wrote:
On 2/8/11 4:29 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
As I stated in the assertNotThrown thread, I don't see any reason why this
s
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
Andrei
++vote.
It's worth noting that the exception chaining (as implemented in the
Windows version of the next DMD2) means that it is poss
On Tue, 08 Feb 2011 10:29:54 -0500, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in Jonathan
> M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
>
> Andrei
Yes
Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
> Reply here to vote ONLY for the function collectExceptionMsg in
> Jonathan M Davis's std.unittests. Vote closes on Tue Feb 15.
>
> Andrei
I vote for inclusion.
Jens
