On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:54:53 +
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
What do other people think?
On Sun, 17 Mar 2013 21:54:53 +
Stewart Gordon smjg_1...@yahoo.com wrote:
[...]
What do other people think?
Agree. I'm surprised to hear people are closing them. (What is this,
StackOverflow? ;) )
On Sunday, 17 March 2013 at 21:54:54 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
However, since that time, two or three people have been killing
off random trackers, seemingly because they personally don't
like the concept.
No, because the bugs in question were junk. Junk bugs get killed
all the time (eg,
On Sunday, March 17, 2013 21:54:53 Stewart Gordon wrote:
There seems to be disagreement between various users on the propriety of
trackers. These are bug reports that don't describe a single bug, nor a
feature request, but are used to group together related issues.
Trackers (also known as
On 18/03/2013 15:56, Don wrote:
On Sunday, 17 March 2013 at 21:54:54 UTC, Stewart Gordon wrote:
However, since that time, two or three people have been killing off
random trackers, seemingly because they personally don't like the
concept.
No, because the bugs in question were junk.
snip
On 18/03/2013 18:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
snip
Walter and Brad Roberts are both very much against them, favoring keywords for
keeping track of related bugs. It was recently discussed in the druntime
newsgroup:
Uh, that doesn't seem to be a newsgroup for some obscure reason.
On Monday, March 18, 2013 22:27:44 Stewart Gordon wrote:
On 18/03/2013 18:10, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
snip
Walter and Brad Roberts are both very much against them, favoring keywords
for keeping track of related bugs. It was recently discussed in the
druntime
newsgroup:
Uh, that
There seems to be disagreement between various users on the propriety of
trackers. These are bug reports that don't describe a single bug, nor a
feature request, but are used to group together related issues.
Trackers (also known as meta bugs or umbrella bugs) are used heavily on
Mozilla's
