On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 21:56:52 +0300, Yao G. wrote:
delete didn't worked the way it do in C++. Why on Earth do anybody would
want to use a broken operator?
Huh?
--
Best regards,
Vladimirmailto:vladi...@thecybershadow.net
I don't understand why people complains about this issue. delete didn't
worked the way it do in C++. Why on Earth do anybody would want to use a
broken operator?
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 01:15:07 -0500, F. Almeida
wrote:
Just to satisfy my curiousity about how many D users think that the
del
On Fri, 16 Jul 2010 08:15:07 +0200, F. Almeida
wrote:
Just to satisfy my curiousity about how many D users think that the
delete operator really is evil, I launched a poll in micropoll.com.
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/979834-265542
I miss the option "Should be a wrapper for GC.f
While we are at it, let's get rid of new as well.
"F. Almeida" wrote in message
news:i1otdb$2dl...@digitalmars.com...
Just to satisfy my curiousity about how many D users think that the
delete operator really is evil, I launched a poll in micropoll.com.
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/9
> What about
> "I don't know enough about the issue to form an opinion."
> and
> "I don't care, I don't/rarely use delete anyway."
The latter one would have gotten my vote.
On 16 July 2010 08:15, F. Almeida wrote:
> Just to satisfy my curiousity about how many D users think that the
> delete operator really is evil, I launched a poll in micropoll.com.
>
> http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/979834-265542
>
What about
"I don't know enough about the issue to form a
Just to satisfy my curiousity about how many D users think that the
delete operator really is evil, I launched a poll in micropoll.com.
http://www.micropoll.com/akira/mpview/979834-265542
