On Sat, 2011-01-22 at 15:54 -0500, Jean Crystof wrote:
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
I've been under the impression that, as a rule, the USPTO doesn't check for
prior art and deliberately leaves invalid due to prior art up to the
courts.
That's how it works. The patent threat is always
Don nos...@nospam.com wrote in message
news:ihcrve$1t5l$1...@digitalmars.com...
spir wrote:
On 01/21/2011 03:51 PM, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
Nick Sabalausky Wrote:
I've been under the impression that, as a rule, the USPTO doesn't check for
prior art and deliberately leaves invalid due to prior art up to the
courts.
That's how it works. The patent threat is always there. Someone can patent
delegates, classes, and whatever
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers implementation (delegates)
This was obviously a patent aimed at protecting
On 01/21/2011 03:51 PM, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers implementation (delegates)
This was
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:06:37 -0500, spir denis.s...@gmail.com wrote:
On 01/21/2011 03:51 PM, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent
Am 21.01.2011 21:06, schrieb spir:
On 01/21/2011 03:51 PM, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:18:46 -0500, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:18:57 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer
schvei...@yahoo.com wrote:
Damn, beat my by 11 seconds :)
-Steve
Am 21.01.2011 21:20, schrieb Steven Schveighoffer:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:18:46 -0500, Daniel Gibson metalcae...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 21 Jan 2011 15:18:57 -0500, Steven Schveighoffer schvei...@yahoo.com
wrote:
Damn, beat my by 11 seconds :)
-Steve
*g*
On 01/21/2011 09:18 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
You're thinking of closures (which are also delegates in D), but D's
delegates can also be used to simple point to a member of an object.
It's kind of hidden in the definition:
Delegates to non-static nested functions contain two pieces of data:
the
spir wrote:
On 01/21/2011 03:51 PM, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers implementation (delegates)
Am 21.01.2011 21:31, schrieb spir:
On 01/21/2011 09:18 PM, Daniel Gibson wrote:
You're thinking of closures (which are also delegates in D), but D's
delegates can also be used to simple point to a member of an object.
It's kind of hidden in the definition:
Delegates to non-static nested
Am 21.01.2011 21:55, schrieb Don:
spir wrote:
On 01/21/2011 03:51 PM, Don wrote:
Don wrote:
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method
On Wed, 2011-01-19 at 22:37 +0100, Simen kjaeraas wrote:
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote in message
news:ih7jv4$q49$7...@digitalmars.com...
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:44:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in
On 01/19/2011 10:09 PM, retard wrote:
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:44:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.724.1295465996.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Or pack your bags and move to Europe. :p
I thought Europe was getting
Am 20.01.2011 11:19, schrieb spir:
On 01/19/2011 10:09 PM, retard wrote:
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:44:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrej Mitrovicandrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.724.1295465996.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Or pack your bags and move to Europe. :p
BlazingWhitester wrote:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers implementation (delegates)
This was obviously a patent aimed at protecting Delphi from
On 01/18/2011 05:52 PM, BlazingWhitester wrote:
Walter, could you give some comments about this? Does dmd violate anything?
It's probably in Walter's best interest to not even look at it.
On the one hand, it's probably a crap software patent that the Patent
Office has been handing out like
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:50:46 -0500, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 01/18/2011 05:52 PM, BlazingWhitester wrote:
Walter, could you give some comments about this? Does dmd violate
anything?
It's probably in Walter's best interest to not even look at it.
On the one hand, it's probably a crap
retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote in message
news:ih7dih$q49$2...@digitalmars.com...
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 12:50:46 -0500, Jeff Nowakowski wrote:
On 01/18/2011 05:52 PM, BlazingWhitester wrote:
Walter, could you give some comments about this? Does dmd violate
anything?
It's probably in
Or pack your bags and move to Europe. :p
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.724.1295465996.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Or pack your bags and move to Europe. :p
I thought Europe was getting software patents?
You're thinking EU. :p
On 1/19/11, Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.724.1295465996.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Or pack your bags and move to Europe. :p
I thought Europe was getting software patents?
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:44:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.724.1295465996.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Or pack your bags and move to Europe. :p
I thought Europe was getting software patents?
It's the US
retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote in message
news:ih7jv4$q49$7...@digitalmars.com...
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:44:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:mailman.724.1295465996.4748.digitalmar...@puremagic.com...
Or pack your bags and move
Nick Sabalausky a@a.a wrote:
retard r...@tard.com.invalid wrote in message
news:ih7jv4$q49$7...@digitalmars.com...
Wed, 19 Jan 2011 15:44:38 -0500, Nick Sabalausky wrote:
Andrej Mitrovic andrej.mitrov...@gmail.com wrote in message
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers implementation (delegates)
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/5628016.pdf - describes compiler
support for SEH, also
BlazingWhitester max.kl...@gmail.com wrote in message
news:ih55mp$2gtl$1...@digitalmars.com...
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes
method pointers implementation
Am 18.01.2011 23:52, schrieb BlazingWhitester:
I spotted some patents that can theaten current DMD implementation.
Wanted to clarify things.
http://www.freepatentsonline.com/6185728.pdf - this patent describes method
pointers implementation (delegates)
This is trivial, what idiot grants these
On 2011-01-19 01:15:03 +0200, Daniel Gibson said:
This is trivial, what idiot grants these kind of patents?
And were there really no delegates before Jan. 31 1996 when this was filed?
If I'm not mistaken, Oberon-2 implemented pointers to record-bound
procedures as fat-pointers
30 matches
Mail list logo
