) that would be fantastic.
I'm very happy seeing the prospect of having D support in premake
which looks very clean and being of declarative nature.
Now I wonder how difficult is to add support for other toolchains and
asked about it on the mailing list where Jason replied with: I did
try
very happy seeing the prospect of having D support in premake which
looks very clean and being of declarative nature.
Now I wonder how difficult is to add support for other toolchains and
asked about it on the mailing list where Jason replied with: I did try
to abstract out common functions
toolchains (MSVC/VisualD, Code::Blocks etc) that would be fantastic.
I'm very happy seeing the prospect of having D support in premake
which looks very clean and being of declarative nature.
Now I wonder how difficult is to add support for other toolchains and
asked about it on the mailing
All,
I just wanted to post a note here that I have added support for D(2) to
premake (http://industriousone.com/premake).
The fork is available on Bitbucket
(https://bitbucket.org/goughy/premake-dev-d/overview) and I would
really appreciate feedback if it's of interest to the community.
I have
