On Sun, 06 Mar 2011 09:33:05 -0500, dsimcha wrote:
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5710
It's a DMD issue. I've been meaning to report it for a while.
Unfortunately making a workaround for it would be a huge PITA at best
and impossible in the toughest use cases.
I've run in
On Sun, 2011-03-06 at 09:33 -0500, dsimcha wrote:
> http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5710
>
> It's a DMD issue. I've been meaning to report it for a while.
> Unfortunately making a workaround for it would be a huge PITA at best
> and impossible in the toughest use cases.
OK, I sig
http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=5710
It's a DMD issue. I've been meaning to report it for a while.
Unfortunately making a workaround for it would be a huge PITA at best
and impossible in the toughest use cases.
On 3/6/2011 9:12 AM, Russel Winder wrote:
David,
I am not sure ho
David,
I am not sure how properly to report this in this review period . . .
If I use:
taskPool.reduce ! ( "a + b" ) ( 0.0 , outputData )
then it works. If however I try:
taskPool.reduce ! ( ( a , b ) { return a + b ; } ) ( 0.0 , outputData )
I get:
pi_d2_parallel