Kind of off topic, but a good place to get benchmark results for many
of the programming languages is Sphere Online Judge:
http://www.spoj.pl/problems/classical/
They accept solutions in D, but not many have been submitted. I found a few:
http://www.spoj.pl/ranks/FCTRL/lang=D
http://www.spoj.pl/
On 6/26/2011 2:24 PM, Don wrote:
You may also want to have a look at this paper:
http://www.agner.org/optimize/optimizing_cpp.pdf
I don't know if it still accurately reflects the current state though.
It's a little out of date, DMD now does a couple of things it didn't do when
Agner did the t
Timon Gehr wrote:
Don wrote:
bearophile wrote:
Don:
Sorry for my slow answer, I was quite busy for days.
I've never heard that claim before. Do you have evidence for that?
I compare/convert code to D every day, so I am aware that D code compiled with
DMD is often slower than C/C++ code co
Don wrote:
> bearophile wrote:
>> Don:
>>
>> Sorry for my slow answer, I was quite busy for days.
>>
>>
>>> I've never heard that claim before. Do you have evidence for that?
>>
>> I compare/convert code to D every day, so I am aware that D code compiled
>> with
DMD is often slower than C/C++ code
bearophile wrote:
Don:
Sorry for my slow answer, I was quite busy for days.
I've never heard that claim before. Do you have evidence for that?
I compare/convert code to D every day, so I am aware that D code compiled with
DMD is often slower than C/C++ code compiled with GCC. Since some ye
Don:
Sorry for my slow answer, I was quite busy for days.
> I've never heard that claim before. Do you have evidence for that?
I compare/convert code to D every day, so I am aware that D code compiled with
DMD is often slower than C/C++ code compiled with GCC. Since some years I even
keep a c
bearophile wrote:
Piotr Szturmaj:
I don't know why there's no DMD flavor, though.
The author of that bench has said:
I have not evaluated DMD because I am running the programs on a Linux server I
have no control of. The “libc” is quite old and incompatible with the binary
release of dmd.<
On 6/22/11 6:52 AM, Dmitry Olshansky wrote:
for (q = buf; *q; ++q); if (q > buf) *(q-1) = 0;//was that triming '\n'?
Now that's an interesting line.
Andrei
On 22.06.2011 15:41, bearophile wrote:
Piotr Szturmaj:
I don't know why there's no DMD flavor, though.
The author of that bench has said:
I have not evaluated DMD because I am running the programs on a Linux server I
have no control of. The “libc” is quite old and incompatible with the binar
Piotr Szturmaj:
> I don't know why there's no DMD flavor, though.
The author of that bench has said:
>I have not evaluated DMD because I am running the programs on a Linux server I
>have no control of. The libc is quite old and incompatible with the binary
>release of dmd.<
> It clearly sho
Hi,
I've just found this benchmark which includes GDC and LDC compilers. I
don't know why there's no DMD flavor, though. Here's the link:
http://attractivechaos.wordpress.com/2011/06/22/my-programming-language-benchmark-analyses/
It clearly shows that D is really fast (co
11 matches
Mail list logo
