On Sun, 09 Aug 2009 15:53:23 -0400, Bill Baxter wrote:
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:25 AM, grauzone wrote:
Bill Baxter wrote:
Interesting thing I found out about C# properties.
The syntax
int Thing {
get { return _thing; }
set { _thing = value; }
}
is rewritten by the C# compiler into
in
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 11:25 AM, grauzone wrote:
> Bill Baxter wrote:
>>
>> Interesting thing I found out about C# properties.
>> The syntax
>>
>> int Thing {
>> get { return _thing; }
>> set { _thing = value; }
>> }
>>
>> is rewritten by the C# compiler into
>>
>> int prop_Thing() { return _th
Bill Baxter wrote:
Interesting thing I found out about C# properties.
The syntax
int Thing {
get { return _thing; }
set { _thing = value; }
}
is rewritten by the C# compiler into
int prop_Thing() { return _thing; }
void prop_Thing(int value) { _thing = value; }
Just thought it was inter
On 2009-08-09 00:23:06 -0400, Bill Baxter said:
Dang I remembered wrong from what I read yesterday. C# turns it into
int get_Thing() { return _thing; }
void set_Thing(int value) { _thing = value; }
I don't recall anyone proposing exactly that for D. There was
prop_Thing, and there was getTh
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 12:23 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
>> Interesting thing I found out about C# properties.
>> The syntax
>>
>> int Thing {
>> get { return _thing; }
>> set { _thing = value; }
>> }
>>
>> is rewritten by the C# compiler into
>>
On Sun, Aug 9, 2009 at 10:43 AM, Bill Baxter wrote:
> Interesting thing I found out about C# properties.
> The syntax
>
> int Thing {
> get { return _thing; }
> set { _thing = value; }
> }
>
> is rewritten by the C# compiler into
>
> int prop_Thing() { return _thing; }
> void prop_Thing(int val
Interesting thing I found out about C# properties.
The syntax
int Thing {
get { return _thing; }
set { _thing = value; }
}
is rewritten by the C# compiler into
int prop_Thing() { return _thing; }
void prop_Thing(int value) { _thing = value; }
Just thought it was interesting given all our
