I'm thinking about ways to make std.concurrency's model more flexible
without compromising safety. It's sometimes useful to cheaply _move_
(as opposed to share or copy) data between threads. I wonder if we
could co-opt sealed containers here:
1. Define basic data structures like arrays, has
dsimcha Wrote:
> I'm thinking about ways to make std.concurrency's model more flexible
> without compromising safety. It's sometimes useful to cheaply _move_
> (as opposed to share or copy) data between threads. I wonder if we
> could co-opt sealed containers here:
What definition of sealed
On 3/27/2011 2:47 AM, Jason House wrote:
dsimcha Wrote:
I'm thinking about ways to make std.concurrency's model more flexible
without compromising safety. It's sometimes useful to cheaply _move_
(as opposed to share or copy) data between threads. I wonder if we
could co-opt sealed containers
On 03/26/2011 05:26 PM, dsimcha wrote:
I'm thinking about ways to make std.concurrency's model more flexible
without compromising safety. It's sometimes useful to cheaply _move_ (as
opposed to share or copy) data between threads. I wonder if we could
co-opt sealed containers here:
1. Define basi
