On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
> On 12/09/2013 10:02 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
>> What issues and limitations?
>>
>
> Nothing major and nothing more than you and I have already discussed: ;)
>
> http://forum.dlang.org/post/l579tu$2vta$1...@digitalmars.com
Now I'm feeling
On 12/09/2013 10:02 AM, Philippe Sigaud wrote:
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
What format used Ali? HTML?
DDoc ;-)
I wanted to use what D offered partly to also learn DDoc. DDoc has some
issues and apparently some limitations but it worked for me.
What issues and limi
On Mon, Dec 9, 2013 at 1:42 AM, Ali Çehreli wrote:
>>> What format used Ali? HTML?
>>
>> DDoc ;-)
>
> I wanted to use what D offered partly to also learn DDoc. DDoc has some
> issues and apparently some limitations but it worked for me.
What issues and limitations?
On 12/08/2013 03:03 PM, Raphaël Jakse wrote:
> Le 08/12/2013 22:41, Philippe Sigaud a écrit :
>> What format used Ali? HTML?
>
> DDoc ;-)
I wanted to use what D offered partly to also learn DDoc. DDoc has some
issues and apparently some limitations but it worked for me.
Ali
Le 08/12/2013 22:41, Philippe Sigaud a écrit :
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
On 12/8/13 1:22 PM, Raphaël Jakse wrote:
To be fair, I used Whata! mainly because I am the author of this syntax
and I'm used to it.
I'd say that's a perfectly reasonable answer.
We
Le 08/12/2013 22:29, Andrei Alexandrescu a écrit :
On 12/8/13 1:22 PM, Raphaël Jakse wrote:
To be fair, I used Whata! mainly because I am the author of this syntax
and I'm used to it.
I'd say that's a perfectly reasonable answer.
I can try to explain why I wrote Whata! instead of Markdown.
On Sun, Dec 8, 2013 at 10:29 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu
wrote:
> On 12/8/13 1:22 PM, Raphaël Jakse wrote:
>>
>> To be fair, I used Whata! mainly because I am the author of this syntax
>> and I'm used to it.
>
>
> I'd say that's a perfectly reasonable answer.
Well, using Ddoc would be a good demonstr
On 12/8/13 1:22 PM, Raphaël Jakse wrote:
To be fair, I used Whata! mainly because I am the author of this syntax
and I'm used to it.
I'd say that's a perfectly reasonable answer.
I can try to explain why I wrote Whata! instead of Markdown.
Does Whata! have a good macro system? After much th
Le 08/12/2013 18:05, Philippe Sigaud a écrit :
First, kudos for translating all this! I'm sure that'll be a good
reference and maybe pave the way for other translations (Spanish,
German & Japanese come to mind).
I have a few questions:
- why did you use this whata! language instead of a standar
