Since issue 8185 has been closed, I'm still very confused. I just
understood that endless discussion doesn't result in anything.
See example from http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8185#c40
---
int f(size_t p) pure
{
return *cast(int*) p;
}
void g(size_t p, ref size_t) pure
{
On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 11:59:10 Denis Shelomovskij wrote:
Since issue 8185 has been closed, I'm still very confused. I just
understood that endless discussion doesn't result in anything.
See example from http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8185#c40
---
int f(size_t p) pure
{
Denis Shelomovskij , dans le message (digitalmars.D:171072), a écrit :
Since issue 8185 has been closed, I'm still very confused. I just
understood that endless discussion doesn't result in anything.
See example from http://d.puremagic.com/issues/show_bug.cgi?id=8185#c40
---
int f(size_t
On Wednesday, July 04, 2012 09:21:35 Christophe Travert wrote:
What change would you expect in the langage? making pure function
automatically @safe? That may not be such a ba idea. However, that is
not even enough, you could still create bug from optimizations with
casting outside the pure
